Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eulalefty/Archive

11 May 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both Users have an issue with the addition of "According to the World Christian Encyclopedia, the fastest-growing branch of Islam is Ahmadiyya." on Muslim population growth. Although the registered user last edited the article on 13th April, the IP user began its first edit on 15th April. They both have edited the articles Megalopolis (city type) and List of languages by total number of speakers. They have edited the same row of table here and here.  --Peace world  10:13, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I do forget from time to time to login into my account. 198.16.164.205 (talk) 10:42, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I would like to assume good faith, but you have forgotten to login in every edit concerning Muslim population growth, which amounts to edits over 4 different days? --Peace world  11:09, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Second, you have made a lot more edits via IP than your account. --Peace world  11:13, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I login mostly to edit protected articles otherwise I just simply edit. 198.16.164.205 (talk) 11:50, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, 198.16.164.205 is currently my IP address. Eulalefty (talk) 12:32, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * User:Peaceworld111 is in violation of WP:SPA because he has hardly made any edits outside of these two topics Ahmadiyya and Islam. Eulalefty (talk) 13:03, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * No, they are not a SPA - Islam is a broad topic - and it is a borderline personal attack to call them such. If you have a problem with their edits, this is not the proper venue, so I must direct you elsewhere. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:22, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - CheckUsers will not publicly link named accounts to IP addresses.
 * If 198.16.164.205 is you, please confirm that above while logged into your account. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:24, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * In that case, you are instructed to log in to your account before making any edits or you may have your IP address and/or account blocked. Making disputed edits from your IP address is disruptive and is a violation of policy. I will not make any blocks at this time, but I and other admins will not hesitate to place blocks in the future. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:56, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

29 May 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility


 * User:Johnzsmith was created moments after User:Eulalefty responded against an SPI case I filed against the latter a few weeks ago. The latter appears to have gone quite.
 * Both have an issue with the presence of the mention of Ahmadiyya on the Muslim population growth.
 * Both have edited on In the news/Candidates
 * Both have written about Ibn al-Haytham, one on the article Science, here and the other one on the corresponding talk page here
 * Both have edited Megalopolis (city type), with both edits concerning Indonesia cities here and here --Peace world  21:34, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Yes, I have been influenced by User:Eulalefty edits that's what lead me to create an account and become active member on Wikipedia, I won't hide that. I even watch his talk page. Johnzsmith (talk) 21:58, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - - Eulalefty was abandoned before Johnzsmith started editing. But, since he claims he is not the same as Eulalefty, this may be regarded as disruptive. Evidence is enough to run a CU check.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  22:09, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅ to each other, and .-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  22:24, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Follow-up: I've blocked and tagged the accounts. Given the level of deception, they have all been blocked indef.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:34, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

16 June 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User:Eulaefty and his/her sockpuppet accounts have a history of editing the article Muslim population growth and adding the phrase "but Ahmadis are considered non-Muslims by the mainstream Muslims." After having reported sockpuppets of User:Eulaefty twice they were blocked. Afterwards I reverted the edit of a sockpuppet that had by now been blocked and removed the phrase. After about two weeks User:Advilgetup creates an account and reverts my edit which most likely means that the user was aware of the situation two weeks earlier. It is important to note also that the revert was the user's first edit. (Note that most new users are even unaware of the existence of the revert button). The editor endorsed the edit by sockpuppets of User:Eulaefty by stating "Not sure why this shouldn't be added." By creating a two week delay, it appears to be an attempt to bypass previous evidences that were used against sockpuppets of User:Eulaefty. I hope I am wrong in my assessment.  --Peace world  20:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is ✅ and blocked along with the sleeper .-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Accounts tagged. Mike V • Talk 00:52, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

18 July 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User:Eulalefty, its sockpuppets and (declared) IPs have a history of writing Ahmadiyya as a "non-Muslim" group. For one of many examples see here. Yesterday, an account was created User:Bharatooz under which the following edit was made: here, declaring Ahmadiyya as a "heterodox" denomination. Roughly 3 hours later a (declared) IP of the sockmaster, namely User:198.16.164.205 creates a link to the word "heterodox", here. It appears the user must have logged off by mistake and given away the evidence.  --Peace world  09:06, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - to compare Bharatooz with previous socks. The IP was used by Eulalefty in May (see: ), ans according to the recent edits, it is still used by him. Since it is static, I recommend one month block to the IP.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  09:46, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * is ❌.
 * I've blocked/tagged the two confirmed accounts and blocked the IP for one month as requested.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:02, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Closing the case. The evidence against Bharatooz is too weak for any action.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  14:14, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I've blocked/tagged the two confirmed accounts and blocked the IP for one month as requested.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:02, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Closing the case. The evidence against Bharatooz is too weak for any action.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  14:14, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

21 July 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I am getting fed up reverting socks on Muslim population growth. An account User:Earnshulks was created solely to remove the following sentence According to the World Christian Encyclopedia, the fastest-growing branch of Islam is Ahmadiyya, something which the socks of Eulalefty have always had an issue with. This "new" user is definitely aware of Wikipedia jargon such as "edit-warring"; "vandalism" and knowns the existence of policies, see here and. Incidentally, the user uses the same "edit-warring" argument in his/her edit-summary as the sockmaster Eulalefty, here. Perhaps I'm clutching at straws here.  --Peace world  18:03, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:36, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:36, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:36, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

24 July 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The account is created soon after the last set of blocks. I think that should suffice as evidence although there is a lot more.  --Peace world  09:51, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Removes mention of Ahmadiyya once again in Muslim population growth here with another reason.
 * Edits Talk:Science here supporting the edit here by User:Johnzsmith.
 * Edits Megacity here like User:Johnzsmith here
 * Edits Islamic eschatology here like a host of edits here by the (declared) IP User:198.16.164.205.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Please see Reliable_sources/Noticeboard. The changes I made was through proper channels. I am not Eulalefty. Jjkajaja (talk) 11:48, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - per povided evidence.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  13:28, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * is ✅. Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:38, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

30 July 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The two similar usernames are essentially expanded versions of User:Jjkajaja. The accounts were created soon after Jjkajaja was blocked. Secondly, Jayjaykijayjay continues to maintain editing interests of sockpuppets of Eualefty.  --Peace world  16:43, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''



Adding another likely account. 2601:188:0:ABE6:489F:358E:490D:8C66 (talk) 17:24, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * , and  are all ✅, blocked and tagged.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  17:32, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * ...and we also have blocked and tagged.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  18:14, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

10 May 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

It seems that the sockmaster has begun its cycle once again, roughly a year after it was first reported. Dozens of sock acounts, IP addresses, and proxy addresses have been blocked that have been linked to the sockmaster. I present the following evidence which links this IP address to the sockmaster and its puppets:
 * Muslim population growth: Both are agitated that the source describe Ahmadiyya as the fastest growing Muslim sect, using the same arguments. IP evidence - & ; sock evidence -
 * Salafi jihadism: Added exactly the same paragraph to the article. IP evidence - ; sock evidence -
 * Islamic eschatology: Both have significant interest in editing this article: IP evidence ; sock evidence - or alternatively check itshistory.
 * In the news/Candidates: IP address: ; sock evidence -
 * Islamic Golden Age: IP evidence - ; sock evidence -
 * Both, the IP and the socks appear to have an interest in labelling the Ahmadiyya Islamic sect as non-Muslim: IP evidence - ; sock evidence -

I should perhaps add, if at all relevant, that the sockmaster and its puppets have accused me of vandalism, e.g., , and may have been guilty of a personal attack against me,  --Peace  world  13:45, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

This IP and the IP associated to the sockmaster,  both originate from Ontario, Canada. --Peace  world  14:13, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Obvious block evasion. Blocked.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:55, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The following evidence should suffice:
 * Twitteristhebest (falsely) claimed at Meta 1 that I have been harassing him or her at the article Muslim population growth. It turns out, as can be easily verified, that Twitteristhebest never really has edited this article, nor its talk page. The only individual that I have confronted on Muslim population growth is Eulalefty and his or her sockpuppets, as can be seen in page's archive.
 * Both users are advocates of Alhazen at the article Science: Eulalefty's edit 2; Twitteristhebest's edit 3
 * Both are interested in population ranks for Karachi in List of metropolitan areas by population: Sock's edit 4; Twitteristhebest's edit 5.  --Peace world  09:53, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is ✅ along with a bunch of sleeper accounts:


 * All blocked.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:51, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Tagged and closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

IP has edited
 * Muslim population growth, upholding the same view as that of the Eulalefty and its socks
 * Islamic eschatology, being interested in editing the same section on "Ghazwa-e-Hind". Sock edit:
 * In the news/Candidates,

This IP is also from the same region as the the one belonging to the sockmaster.  --Peace world  19:35, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Obvious block evasion. Blocked.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:10, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This account was created almost 2 hours after I reported the last sock here.


 * This account continues to have an interest in removing or questioning the validity of the source in Muslim population growth which describes Ahmadiyya as the fastest growing denomination in Islam, like many socks of Eulalefty.
 * continues to be interested in Ibn Haytham's entry in the article Science, like many socks of Eulalefty.
 * continues to interested in editing Alhazen, like many socks of Eualefty.  --Peace world  09:07, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
because of timing and this user's lengthy archive history of socks. Please also check for sleepers here. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 18:39, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * What accounts aren't stale?--Bbb23 (talk) 19:06, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Just in case a CU can do anything with Metaphysicswar, and/or with any info on Eulalefty that might have been saved in the CU wiki from past checks. If not, I'll understand if you need to decline.  —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 19:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * My knowledge of this case is pretty old, but I'll take a stab at it. 's knowledge is more recent, so she might be able to add something when she's back on-wiki.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:33, 10 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The following accounts are ✅ from each other and to the master:
 * Blocked without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:45, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 19:57, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Based on a post to my Talk page I'm adding the following accounts to the above group:
 * The first three are clearly related to the above group, whereas the other two are clearly related to each other but more complex behaviorally. Blocked all without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:12, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Behaviourally speaking,, , , , and all created the same user page as  from my June 8, 2016 archived check. Based on the behavioral and technical overlap I've tagged them as proven.
 * There are multiple behavioural boxes ticked between and  and confirmed sock  from the archive so I've tagged them as proven as well. (There's WP:BEANS involved, so email me if further info is needed).
 * Given the technical evidence confirming the connection between to sock  above, I have tagged it as proven as well. Closing. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  20:27, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The first three are clearly related to the above group, whereas the other two are clearly related to each other but more complex behaviorally. Blocked all without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:12, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Behaviourally speaking,, , , , and all created the same user page as  from my June 8, 2016 archived check. Based on the behavioral and technical overlap I've tagged them as proven.
 * There are multiple behavioural boxes ticked between and  and confirmed sock  from the archive so I've tagged them as proven as well. (There's WP:BEANS involved, so email me if further info is needed).
 * Given the technical evidence confirming the connection between to sock  above, I have tagged it as proven as well. Closing. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  20:27, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The first three are clearly related to the above group, whereas the other two are clearly related to each other but more complex behaviorally. Blocked all without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:12, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Behaviourally speaking,, , , , and all created the same user page as  from my June 8, 2016 archived check. Based on the behavioral and technical overlap I've tagged them as proven.
 * There are multiple behavioural boxes ticked between and  and confirmed sock  from the archive so I've tagged them as proven as well. (There's WP:BEANS involved, so email me if further info is needed).
 * Given the technical evidence confirming the connection between to sock  above, I have tagged it as proven as well. Closing. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  20:27, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Account created on 18 September, we can see same obsessional edit warring from him over same lead material on Islam, Science and Pakistan, like he did previously with his sock Twitteristhebest. Lorstaking (talk) 11:36, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - As far as I can tell all Eulalefty socks have gone stale, so in that respect . However, this account certainly quacks. Compare edit summaries ("linked" - ). What most convinced me, though, is the shared insistence that Pakistan is "considered a cradle of civilization", using the same wording and sources . Please indef the sock.  Sro23 (talk) 15:45, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Done. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:10, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility


 * per below. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  19:22, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * After going through archives, I am realizing there are more socks. There is an IP that is making same edits on Islam in South Asia as the IP that had blocked. Both IPs are same. Lorstaking (talk) 08:56, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I checked Shuman based on the archived report from earlier today and Eulalefty's history of operating multiple sock accounts at once. All listed socks are ✅, blocked and tagged.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:22, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Before I archive this, is there a particular reason ShalahPIA isn't tagged? Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Just an oversight on my part. Tag away! -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:52, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The more go through into the histories of concerning articles the more I find socks.


 * 000meow:

Same obsession with claiming Pakistan to be "cradle of civilization", (though "civilisation" is correct spelling for Pakistani articles) obsession with lead on Islam, created the article Islam in South Asia where the recently blocked IP per last report has heavily contributed, making too many trivial edits on user page.


 * Jacmacbac

Created Template:Islam in South Asia like above account created the article. And blocked IP contributed so much on this template that Ponyo had reverted them. Has also made major edits to Islam in South Asia.


 * 70.50.132.126

Since (24 October) blocked the sock IP, a new IP from same location popped up on same day. Promoting the template/article created by above accounts and using same edit summaries.

Once these socks are blocked, I believe it would be better to just G5 these problematic creations. Lorstaking (talk) 05:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Though, I've WP:DUCK blocked and  as obvious socks, as well as 000meow's declared "alternative account" . I also deleted the template create by the Jacmacbac sock and removed the transclusions of the template to articles. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  17:25, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The new account is making same problematic edits as the sockmaster. Lorstaking (talk) 16:37, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * block evasion with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2601:14F:4500:F9B9:65C4:6FB0:38A:F35C restored content of this blocked sock and mentioned "Pakistan page", that IPs cannot edit but this sock had. Capitals00 (talk) 04:24, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - To flush out any sleepers. Sro23 (talk) 16:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't see any obvious accounts, but User:BU Rob13 blocked some of the IPV6 addresses used by this editor in mid-October. Doug Weller  talk 17:49, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Belay that. I see a connection with Sockpuppet investigations/Chanakya Volume 2/Archive but I've got to stop now. Hopefully BU Rob13 can confirm this. Doug Weller  talk 17:53, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
 * comments? Doug Weller  talk 18:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The Norm account is definitely ✅ to Chanakya Volume 2. ~ Rob 13 Talk 17:25, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I've blocked them. I'll leave it to the clerk to decide whether to tag. I don't have time today to add it to that SPI, tomorrow. Doug Weller  talk 17:33, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I've added a one month range block to the IPv6 range that the Norm account has been using. Doug Weller  talk 16:54, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * No tag. Added the sock to Sockpuppet investigations/Chanakya Volume 2. Closing. GABgab 03:24, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Edit warring over restoring the article from redirect that he basically created with his socks, by calling them "good registered users and IPs." Capitals00 (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Per sockmaster's history of multiple sleepers. Sro23 (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ and  belong to the master. - Mailer Diablo 18:04, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Tagged sockpuppets. Sro23 (talk) 18:31, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Same name as one previous sock "Shumam" and contributing to Islam in India like past sock.

The listed IP's rampant socking is going on, it's ISP and location matches with the past IP sock.

Robertsmith1 and Reallyhotchewypizza are blocked but they belong to this sockmaster since they have also pushed same POV on Muslim and Islam by country. Lorstaking (talk) 04:06, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Shuman9 is ✅ to Robertsmith1 and socks in the archive. I’ve blocked and tagged Shuman9. Robertsmith1 and his socks need to be retagged as belonging to Eulalefty.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Retagged the Robertsmith1 socks. Closing. Sro23 (talk) 16:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Same preoccupation with Islam, Pakistan and Science, same as Eulalefty and previous and previous socks, e.g.. Khirurg (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
+ Same to same intersection in articles with some socks. + CU Likely  QEDK ( 桜  ❄  伴 ) 19:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * is - TNT❤ 18:52, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * - + Almost similar writing style.
 * Blocked and tagged. clpo13(talk) 00:17, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Obviously Eulalefty: 1, 2 , 3 , etc.

Consider doing a thorough check because last check was done a few months ago. He sure got many sleepers now. Lorstaking (talk) 12:00, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

First example of diffs above showed him using distinctive edit summary "space?" 

As usual he is editing his favorite articles: Islam, Pakistan and Science.

Last sock was blocked on 9 February and 12 days later Karachiguy was created.

Added with edit summary "cn" on same paragraph.

Same edit summaries:-
 * "linked": socks, Karachiguy
 * "space?": socks, Karachiguy
 * "already linked above" on Islam. Lorstaking (talk) 04:22, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The case is. CU declined.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:37, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't find this very "obvious". can you explain what in the first and second pairs of diffs is similar?
 * Ping who's dealt with this case before. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 21:16, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Sock now blocked based on the newly provided evidence. Sro23 (talk) 12:21, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The writing style is almost always same to same for this particular subset, which leads me to concur, seconding the block. -- QEDK ( 後  ☕  桜 ) 13:50, 27 August 2018 (UTC)