Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eurallfree/Archive

29 January 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Mass COI/tag team editing, newish accounts, with a single purpose, removal of referenced material. see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=European_Alliance_for_Freedom&action=history Werieth (talk) 16:01, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

@WilliamH: Checkuser may be useful for highlighting apparent connections between the other four accounts, regardless of Eurallfree being stale. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:23, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Note: Puccipu is claiming to have no connection to the other four accounts. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:18, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I've blocked Alliance of european freedom as a username vio, and I see that European Alliance for Freedom has already been blocked for the same reason. Alliance of european freedom is obviously related, and I suspect Puccipu is too. I don't think CheckUser is going to reveal anything more than what is already apparent, and Eurallfree is anyway. WilliamH (talk) 16:13, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * CheckUser isn't necessary when it's not likely to reveal anything that isn't already obvious. If disruption to the page continues, reopen the case and CU can be used to see if the disruption can be stopped without protecting the page so that other users may edit it. Note that editing with a new account after one's previous account was blocked for a username violation can never be considered sockpuppetry. WilliamH (talk) 20:46, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  19:55, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Closing case for now. Please refile if there is new evidence.