Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Evert Wandelaar/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I had first reverted the suspected sock with this edit March 10th because it was not sourced concerning "Petrous Comestor in his Historia Scholastica identified Ahasuerus as Artaxerxes III and Artaxerxes II and Esther 10:1-2" in the article Ahasuerus. After that revert, an unpleasant dispute occurred with the suspected sock on his/her talk page and then the user blanked the discussion and stopped editing Wikipedia entirely: March 11. After, the suspected master added back a similar if not exact edit via March 21. — JudeccaXIII (talk) 00:37, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The two accounts are /. One is editing from a probable proxy server. Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:03, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK: Same articles got edited, same sources were used (Roman Ghirshman, Iran (1954), Penguin Books, p 191; Pritchard, James B. ed., Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament, Princeton University Press, third edition with supplement 1969, p. 492), he locates to an IP in the Netherlands and the indeffed username is Dutch (and he is still active on the Dutch Wikipedia). Also, the IP pushes the POV that Koresh in Hebrew would not mean Cyrus in English, in order to beg the question that the Hebrew Bible is inerrant in respect to the prophecies regarding the rebuilding of the Temple, which was also a huge concern of the sock master (see Talk:Darius_the_Mede). Both introduce the Aramaic name or change the Hebrew name to Aramaic name in Artaxerxes I of Persia or Ahasuerus. Tgeorgescu (talk) 07:41, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

E.g. = Hebrew, Ezra 4:7: Artachsasta = Aramaic vs. (edit summary The name Artaḥšásta is used in the Aramatic parts of the Bible, indicating it is Aramatic.). The Darius of the book of Ezra uses the king's title which was only introduced by Xerxes as well vs. (edit summary Kores possibly Xerxes.) and Kores' title however "king of the Persians" was only introduced by Cyrus' grandson Xerxes. Ad nauseam WP:Advocacy of such POV (i.e. Koresh doesn't mean Cyrus because WP:OR tells him so):, , and. About the last diff: KJV says In the third year of Cyrus king of Persia a thing was revealed unto Daniel, i.e. KJV uses Cyrus, not Koresh, as the IP has mistakenly stated. Tgeorgescu (talk) 08:18, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Caught by at  (edit summary Reverted to revision 827167225 by Hertz1888: Confusing and looks like a misuse of the source, which says "In the first year of his rule at Babylon, Cyrus issued a decree permitting the Jews to return from captivity".). Caught by at  (edit summary Undid revision 828809890 by 94.210.116.247 (talk) continuing the edit war while logged out is not cool). Meaning pretty much the same information got reverted as introduced by the sock master at. Such information in its own turn got reverted by Doug Weller at. Tgeorgescu (talk) 09:28, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Of course I appear mean and heavy-handed to you, because you do not want to abide by our WP:RULES. I walked the extra mile with you, explained in full detail why WP:OR is not allowed, but you failed to get the point. I offered you the benefit of the doubt till I could no longer do so without looking severely demented. Your personal attacks only strengthen my case: both at the talk page of the sock master, where you are no longer allowed to edit your own talk page as at this very investigation. Tgeorgescu (talk) 09:51, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

To whom it may concern: why the lady doth protest too much, methinks? Because he wants Jesus born exactly 480 years after the Temple got rebuilt, see. For him, Jesus has to be born exactly 480 years after the Temple got rebuilt. More precisely, since the altar of the Temple got consecrated. So, obviously, he cannot make his claim believable, that's why he has to play fast and loose with mainstream history. For him Koresh in Hebrew cannot mean Cyrus in English, because this rock-solid mainstream view of historians and theologians of all stripes and colors ruins his claim about the birth of Jesus. So, that's why he was pushing his POV piecemeal, in order to WP:Advocate his view that Jesus got born precisely 480 years after the Temple got sanctified. There is no way to achieve such result by playing fair (by the WP:RULES). Tgeorgescu (talk) 07:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I would like to enter a serious complaint against editor Tgeorgescu, look at his encounters with me and his encounters with others.

He appears to be on a mission to destroy everything in his way, a pure Wikipedia hooligan who slanders, terrorizes and destructs.

If you would like to enter his bandwagon, I can't stop you of course 94.210.116.247 (talk) 09:42, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . The apparently static IP has been blocked for a year. Favonian (talk) 09:50, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK at Ahasuerus. tgeorgescu (talk) 18:57, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * These are now all blocked with the exception of one IP that last edited over a month ago. If that /64 resumes editing we can block it, too. Closing. GABgab 14:59, 31 August 2021 (UTC)