Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Evildoer187/Archive

22 December 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

There is an ongoing content dispute on the page in question, with increasingly irrational behavior being demonstrated by one party (Evildoer187) to that dispute. He has demonstrated a clear tendency to try and rally stack the numbers in favor of his POV to little avail, and it would appear that he is trying to have a currently filed RfC be archived before it has even had a chance to run its course. The IP address in question has only been active on Wikipedia since 19 December, two days before the edits in question. Evildoer187 has been frequently in contact with an administrator EdJohnston, so there is no possibility of him not being aware of the comment EdJonston made to me on his Talk page in response to the RfC.

User_talk:EdJohnston "Expect an RfC to take as long as thirty days. There is a bot which will remove RfC templates after that amount of time. In practice many RfCs reach a result sooner. The fact that nobody agrees with you yet might be a hint that you need to seek support from people of a more mainstream nature. Consider asking Moxy what it would take to persuade him. EdJohnston (talk) 17:26, 15 December 2012 (UTC)"

diff 1 diif1

diff 2 diff2

diff 3 diff3 Ubikwit (talk) 08:57, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * case moved from Sockpuppet investigations/72.74.59.228.
 * A report filled with lots of words like "clear tendency", "no possibility" and "increasingly irrational" and little evidence. The evidence that is here is that the IP shows up and fiddles with the archive duration, and when that IP is reverted, Evildoer187 reverts to the IP's duration. Suspicious? Yes. Sufficient evidence to prove sockpuppetry? No. I'm getting quite fed up of the battleground that is the "indigenous peoples" dispute. You're really edit warring over the archive duration on the talk page? Lame. Expect much less patience from me next time I have to deal with something like this. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 02:16, 23 December 2012 (UTC)