Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Executionary/Archive

22 January 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I came about these accounts at Greg Brockman. Numericality created that article as his tenth edit, showing a rather great familiarity with Wikipedia. When it was speedied as a repost, Executionary removed the speedy deletion template despite being unable to see the previously deleted version. Now both accounts argue against the deletion at AfD with the same misunderstanding on whether passing mentions and name-drops suffice to establish notability. The user pages are very, very similar, stylistically. Also compare recently-created articles Babylon Health and Creative Market - the brand-new account and the one with years of experience have picked up exactly the same elements of wiki code. To me this looks like coordinated promotional activity, either by socks or by related accounts operated by meatpuppets. Huon (talk) 21:35, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Indeed, the technical evidence is definitely, and the behaviour lends me to thinking they are the same. Courcelles (talk) 21:37, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 10:24, 28 January 2016 (UTC)