Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Exequel/Archive

22 May 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Both have a very similar editing pattern- creation of crappy hoaxes with fabricated "sources". I'd like a CU confirmation if possible before taking further action against the sockmaster (who is currently serving a 3-month block for a non-sock related issue). HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   17:00, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   17:00, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

Behavioral evidence is more than adequate to establish the link, based on deleted contribs. You could make Duck à l'orange out of this -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 16:48, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * Stepped up to indef block on sockmaster for evading blocks -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 16:51, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * All accounts tagged. Nothing more to do here, so closing. -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 16:57, 23 May 2010 (UTC)