Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fact reporter/Archive

07 July 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Usernames are identical. Both have extensively, , and (evident from page histories). Both seem to have this obsession with keeping these recently created articles from deletion despite the articles' shortcomings and failures to meet proper sourcing requirements. — Ryulong ( 琉竜 ) 18:08, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Fact reporter1 has admitted to this fact but has revealed he works for a firm that performs edits on behalf of clients. It is important to see what other accounts may be operated by this firm to see if other articles may have conflict of interest issues.— Ryulong ( 琉竜 ) 18:43, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' Wondering if this account, which has similar COI issues, is related. 76.248.151.159 (talk) 19:52, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅. No sleepers found. Tiptoety  talk 19:42, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocked both as promospam. As far as Bigrichtexas, it didn't come in the CU, so probably not. Rschen7754 07:18, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

11 July 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Editor appeared shortly after user:Fact reporter and user:Fact reporter1 were blocked, and proceeded to edit in the same articles and continue discussions that had involved Fact reporter (see User talk:NeilN). - Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:51, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

See also. The SSP account did not actually add to the article. -- Neil N   talk to me  15:56, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Took a quick look at the SPA's contribs, and the copying/pasting of previous socks' work quacks loudly. Looks very . One account per editor please. WilliamH (talk) 16:04, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocked. Tiptoety  talk 01:19, 15 July 2013 (UTC)