Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Faizal batliwala/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Kalekar M created his account recently and he has created exact article which was deleted as per deletion discussion here. He has published the article by using the special character in article's title. Priyanjali singh (talk) 06:28, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * I ended up on this page (Kenan Crnkïc) while i was reviwing NPP. I am also surprised to see the page being recreated by a new user using the same sources and content that i had written. I have no clue who this user is and why they are copying/pasting my work. The entry is exact identical to previous version. I have been on Wikipedia for quite a long time and very well aware of Wikipedia's policies on abusing multiple accounts WP:SOCK. I don't know this user and what their intentions are. What if i recreate an article which was previously created by Priyanjali singh and deleted in an AFD discussion, will that mean i am sock of Priyanjali singh?
 * Why would i even recreate Kenan Crnkïc when i already know its been deleted after a discussion in AFD where it was determined the subject was not notable. I would leave it until the subject gains notability. Anyways, I have no obection if a check user performs a CU in order to find out if i am the same person or not.Faizal batliwala (talk) 11:17, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Requesting an SPI user to have a look at this investigation as well. Thanks.Faizal batliwala (talk) 15:38, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * See my note at the related SPI. Closing. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)