Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Faltu Katha/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Appears to be a case of sock or meatpuppetry. The suspected sock was registered a few days ago possibly to contest deletion at Articles for deletion/Sarsagun Patrika and they also strikethrough other users !vote. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 08:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Thanks for checking, DatGuy. Those accounts were created after Wikilovery was blocked so we might be back here to file a 4th notice in the near future. Liz Read! Talk! 01:10, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked per behavioral evidence. Thanks for reporting this. —  Newslinger   talk   05:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * See also and  for additional behavioral evidence. —  Newslinger   talk   05:17, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Suspected there were sleepers. ✅ plus . DatGuyTalkContribs 23:18, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Obvious one. Registered on the day Faltu Katha stopped editing to comment on an AFD of one of the sockpuppeteer's articles. And just recreated that article at another title after the AFD closed as delete. Since Faltu Katha is now blocked, this is block evasion. MrOllie (talk) 02:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I used twinkle to open this and was not aware there was already another report. MrOllie (talk) 02:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked per behavioral evidence, as noted in . Thanks for reporting this. —  Newslinger  talk   05:15, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
New, precocious editor whose account was created a few days after Faltu Katha was blocked. Faltu Katha was adament that an article they created, Sarsagun Patrika, shouldn't be deleted (see Articles for deletion/Sarsagun Patrika). Wikilovery not only participated in the AFD after Faltu Katha was blocked but they went to REFUND to ask for the article to be restored (see Requests for undeletion]). When it was naturally declined, they recreated it at Sar Sagun Patrika which was deleted as a CSD G4. If they aren't the same editor, there is a tight bond between the two editors. Liz Read! Talk! 04:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I, likewise, was not aware there were two similar reports already posted. Liz Read! Talk! 04:17, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked per behavioral evidence, as noted in . Thanks for reporting this. —  Newslinger  talk   05:16, 15 March 2024 (UTC)