Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fastballjohnd/Archive

28 June 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

All three accounts plus the IP are being used for making edits to John D'Acquisto. It is fact that this person is editing his WP article. Here is a edit for proof of what I'm saying.

The IP edited back into D'Acquisto's article the parts where D'Acquisto claims he is innocent of crimes he was convicted of. Previously Fastballjohnd made an edit putting in the same names.

Johnd34 and Drjohndacquisto have limited edit histories but they consist entirely of edits to the John D'Acquisto and documents that supposedly back up his innocence claim. ...William 01:18, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * - suggesting a CU to be sure though. - The Bushranger One ping only 01:42, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * and are a ✅ match;  is stale. As usual, no comment regarding the IP.  Salvio  Let's talk about it! 09:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I indef blocked the socks, blocked the master for 48 hours, and left he IP unblocked. If the IP starts editing again please refile a case. Tiptoety  talk 02:24, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

26 July 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets



New account pops up and immediately edits the John D'Acquisto article and the section about D'Acquisto's post playing career. Fastballjohnd also edited in here about his educational acheivements. I request a Check user be done....William 14:27, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Looks suspicious enough for a CU check to me. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:47, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  19:34, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * - Agree that this should be checked and sleepers flushed if any.
 * ❌ Behavioral evidence will have to determine this. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  20:15, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * It is very difficult to definitively connect the accounts at this time due to insufficient edits from Tomastrujillo. Feel free to refile if more evidence becomes available. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 02:22, 1 August 2012 (UTC)