Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fatima.Innovative/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Recreating Draft:A-TEEM in similar promotional copyvio form to that created by Horibascientific two weeks ago. It is not an exact copy, this version adds oddly formatted citations (as text) inside of the text that is to a large extent copied from company's web page.

Horibascientific is indef spam blocked, so this isn't only a username violation issue.  Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 10:03, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Probably socks, and if not, then certainly UPE. There's no way somebody with the mastery of English and wiki formatting who wrote Charles Bethea is the same person who wrote Draft:DealHouse, so clearly just a front for other content creators.   Blocked and tagged. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:50, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Recreation of Draft:A-TEEM, which was done by both Fatima.Innovative and Horibascientific. Fatima.Innovative and Audreyhamilton36 both primarily use the visual editor and give off UPE vibes. CU for sleepers given that this account only created Draft:A-TEEM after the block of Fatima.Innovative. Pahunkat (talk) 20:40, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Indef/tag, G5 and salt Draft:A-TEEM. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:19, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

More on A-teem at User:LPinson00/Sample page Pahunkat (talk) 18:24, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * blocked and tagged, G5 -- RoySmith (talk) 19:53, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Found while checking Annaspencer13 while responding to Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard. These are all ✅ to the Fatima.Innovative group. I believe it's possible that there are multiple people behind the keyboard, but technical evidence ties these accounts together quite strongly. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * , I see you upgraded to a CU block right as I filed this, guessing you saw the same thing I did. Any thoughts here? I'm inclined to block all of the accounts listed above. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:07, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Ha,, I think I just pinged you from the other SPI. Also, interesting: User:Ahsandidx is on the same range and could be called a technical match. Note that they declared a COI for something called DIDX. If it is judged that Draft:Ahsan Saleem, which Ahsandidx and User:Risingstarpk both worked on, has any resemblance to the drafts produced by these socks, then we may widen this a bit. Drmies (talk) 01:21, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , I'm inclined to call them unrelated to this particular farm; different technical fingerprint and (imo) much less sophisticated spam. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:42, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * OK--that's fine; honestly I hadn't looked at the drafts yet, and I think I meant "technical" a bit more loosely. Drmies (talk) 01:45, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Closing. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 18:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( originally filed under this user)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The only edits made by SilentM 001 are to Draft:Alice Jacobs. This draft was also edited by Annaspencer13, who has been blocked for undisclosed paid editing. SilentM 001 appears to be both another undisclosed paid editor and a sockpuppet. Request CheckUser also to look for other socks editing other articles. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:20, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
This is all linked to Sockpuppet investigations/Fatima.Innovative. Confirmed and blocked: User:A.Thousand.Wishes, User:SilentM_001, User:Annaspencer13, User:Shanewatson2, User:Fivesenses7879, User:Dave7947, User:Fatima etc., and User:Abdullah Digiliate. Pinging, who dropped a block or two. One of these, 1000 Wishes, disclosed a COI--but that's too little, too late. Drmies (talk) 01:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Re-tagged master as confirmed; tagged two outstanding sox. Closing. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 18:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See below GeneralNotability (talk) 14:49, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Ran a check on Charlette based on their claimed affiliation with Digilate, since other socks in this farm have been associated with them. Charlette9 is ✅ to Fatima.Innovative and several others from the farm. However, I know that I can be a little...aggressive...in my anti-UPE stance, so I'd rather someone else take a look and block if appropriate. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:52, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 15:29, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Looks pretty ducky to me, blocked and tagged. I left some notes in cuwiki. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:47, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅, unambiguous. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106;&#x1D110;&#x1d107; 16:58, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Please see behaviour at Articles for deletion/AJDaGuru and the particular interest in AJDaGuru as noted by expressed at Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents. Obviously there will be no CU comment on the IP Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 20:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Godsentme1 may or may not be related to the previous socks (personally I suspect they aren't directly connected in a way that CU could prove), but the account has been indef blocked for other reasons already. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * CU data says Godsentme1 is somewhere between and ❌.   -- RoySmith (talk) 20:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same pattern of unreported paid editing and copyvios. Account was set up a few days after last sock, Annaspencer13, was blocked. Some of the first editing was on Draft talk:Tony Vázquez-Figueroa, which is the talk page of the page Annaspencer13 created. Annaspencer13 finally kind of admitted to paid editing, and Dianarossok put a paid editing disclaimer on the talk page.

Additionally, Dianarossok edited Prive Jets, which was previously edited by another Fatima.Innovative puppet.— rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:15, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -  Girth Summit  (blether)  06:54, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅ through :
 * Also very
 * One of these last three is already blocked for spamming; the other two are looking fairly spammy. I'm out of time just now, but will take another sweep later today to see if there are any other accounts, then will block, tag, G5 etc. Other CU eyes welcome, there are a lot of IPs in use here. Girth Summit  (blether)  06:56, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Adding another couple of accounts. Perhaps I should call these, rather than confirmed or likely. Some of them intersect at multiple IPs, others seem just to have logged in once and been discarded. Regardless, all of them are doing spammy things (except those which have never edited, and look like sleepers), so I will block them all. Girth Summit  (blether)  08:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Added one more to the list. I've found as many as I think I'm likely to. Some more notes on cuwiki. Closing. Girth Summit  (blether)  19:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Also very
 * One of these last three is already blocked for spamming; the other two are looking fairly spammy. I'm out of time just now, but will take another sweep later today to see if there are any other accounts, then will block, tag, G5 etc. Other CU eyes welcome, there are a lot of IPs in use here. Girth Summit  (blether)  06:56, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Adding another couple of accounts. Perhaps I should call these, rather than confirmed or likely. Some of them intersect at multiple IPs, others seem just to have logged in once and been discarded. Regardless, all of them are doing spammy things (except those which have never edited, and look like sleepers), so I will block them all. Girth Summit  (blether)  08:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Added one more to the list. I've found as many as I think I'm likely to. Some more notes on cuwiki. Closing. Girth Summit  (blether)  19:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * One of these last three is already blocked for spamming; the other two are looking fairly spammy. I'm out of time just now, but will take another sweep later today to see if there are any other accounts, then will block, tag, G5 etc. Other CU eyes welcome, there are a lot of IPs in use here. Girth Summit  (blether)  06:56, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Adding another couple of accounts. Perhaps I should call these, rather than confirmed or likely. Some of them intersect at multiple IPs, others seem just to have logged in once and been discarded. Regardless, all of them are doing spammy things (except those which have never edited, and look like sleepers), so I will block them all. Girth Summit  (blether)  08:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Added one more to the list. I've found as many as I think I'm likely to. Some more notes on cuwiki. Closing. Girth Summit  (blether)  19:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * One of these last three is already blocked for spamming; the other two are looking fairly spammy. I'm out of time just now, but will take another sweep later today to see if there are any other accounts, then will block, tag, G5 etc. Other CU eyes welcome, there are a lot of IPs in use here. Girth Summit  (blether)  06:56, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Adding another couple of accounts. Perhaps I should call these, rather than confirmed or likely. Some of them intersect at multiple IPs, others seem just to have logged in once and been discarded. Regardless, all of them are doing spammy things (except those which have never edited, and look like sleepers), so I will block them all. Girth Summit  (blether)  08:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Added one more to the list. I've found as many as I think I'm likely to. Some more notes on cuwiki. Closing. Girth Summit  (blether)  19:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)