Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FaulconerProductionsMusic/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
I indeffed FaulconerProductionsMusic at 16.31 today for promotional edits under a promotional username to Bruce Faulconer. Account Special:Log/BruceFaulconer was created 46 minutes later and went straight to the same article. Sorry to bring this here – I'd have dealt with it myself but I've edited that article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:48, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 01:11, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Restoration of edits by blocked master (FaulconerProductionsMusic) and sock. See between BruceFaulconer's last version and DBZCzarina's version. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:19, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Very obvious. - please indef the sock. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 12:47, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 13:15, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Both editors are single purpose accounts who have both made long, rambling additions to Articles for deletion/Bruce Faulconer, the article at which the master and other socks were editing. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:09, 15 July 2022 (UTC)


 * It would seem to be more productive to follow
 * Wikipedia rules and respect a valid entry and respect the numerous citations and entries. This all smacks of an attempt at CENSORSHIPWikiLisaMar (talk) 20:47, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Don’t you see that those entries have clearly answered your questions and concerns? Information asked for (citations) and information delivered. Why denigrate entries (citations) that are provided in the spirit of Wikipedia Guidelines and scholarship? WikiLisaMar (talk) 21:04, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * Looks like there's another: >>>  Ingenuity . talk ; 19:56, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * And another: >>>  Ingenuity . talk ; 20:00, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Yet another: >>>  Ingenuity . talk ; 20:11, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * This is my only account on wikipedia, and is the only one I have owned. I am not a sock puppet - Just because you have multiple people disagreeing with you doesn't mean they are fake. You should really try to provide real evidence as to why you are trying to delete Bruce Faulconer's mention on wikipedia by redirection - He has done many things besides Dragon Ball Z in what you call "rambling additions" by the others objecting to your actions. Your main argument is "I cant find a source" and then people send a few dozen. And then you call all the people arguing against you fake. Your claim is untrue. Donatedfalcon (talk) 20:42, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I am not a sock puppet. I am a female gamer and music fanWikiLisaMar (talk) 20:21, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged. Without a CU, it's hard to know whether these are sock or meat puppets, but, either way, they should be blocked - and they are being very disruptive at the AfD. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 21:31, 16 July 2022 (UTC)