Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fcreid/Archive

Report date July 16 2009, 02:46 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Lambchop2008 Classicfilms


 * Evidence submitted by Dstern1

I am unsure whether I have been "tag teamed" or they are socks. However, I have been trying in earnest to explain concerns about bias in Sarah Palin each explanation has been met with response by Fcreid and Simon Dodd with response that I have not presented an argument. Meanwhile, Lambchop2008 (a name screeming puppet) arrives making offensive arguments which get responses from Fcreid and Simon Dodd which lump me with Lambchop2008. Classicfilms joins in seemingly trying to offer a compromise which does not relate to my concerns and Fcreid and Simon Dodd jump to the revisons supposedly presented by Classicfilms. It all seems too well coordinated. My suspicions are just suspicions. No concrete evidence unless Checkuser yields something.


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by Dstern1 (talk) 02:46, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * -- Avi (talk) 17:09, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Without concrete evidence, we can't take any action. We're unable to work off of suspicions. Icestorm815  •  Talk  18:32, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

Jamie  S93  Only You Can Prevent Drama 20:35, 17 July 2009 (UTC)