Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fdghdg12/Archive

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
Both these accounts seem to have an unhealthy obsession with Imperial Monarch and use virtually-identical unblock requests (Fdg, Dgf). As I've no way of knowing if there may be any more in this farm quite yet, I'm requesting a Checkuser to expose any more socks as well as to block the underlying IP (if feasible). —Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 00:04, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by —Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 00:04, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

for checkuser. Auntie E. (talk) 01:30, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * No other socks found, as these two are on open proxies. Dominic·t 07:45, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Jéské Couriano
Same MO as before (harassment of User:Imperial Monarch). Is there another open proxy beneath these? —Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 04:35, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by —Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 04:35, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

To check for any underlying sleepers -- B s a d o w s k i 1   04:53, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

No direct technical links between those accounts, except that each is on a very distinct IP, and they are all being used abusively, almost exclusively. ✅ that =  and  is probably unrelated but it was created on the same mis-configured IP, so please block it. ✅ that = ✅ that =  =  =, and very likely another account which I'll give the benefit of the doubt to. John Vandenberg (chat) 10:41, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I finished up the ones not blocked and tagged everyone. TN X Man  12:03, 6 May 2010 (UTC)