Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Felix Natalo/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets




Evidence submitted by Shannon Rose
Hi, these are users making similar edits apparently to whitewash a duly-sourced article. Identical edits to blank and repeatedly insert unnotable "awards" intended for the organization and not for the subject is what aroused my suspicion. After repeated history of almost everyone editing in favor of the subject and his org turning out to be a sock in the end (please see Petersantos and Dar book), I certainly don't wish to spare recently perma-blocked user Felix Natalo from being investigated. Please compare the following edits: 1 2 3 4 5 6. Thank you and more power! – Shannon Rose Talk 22:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

CheckUser requests
Requested by Shannon Rose Talk 22:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * ✅ as:


 * is ✅ as:
 * . Article also protected. Brandon (talk) 11:26, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * . Article also protected. Brandon (talk) 11:26, 7 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Blocked/tagged all confirmed accounts. The IP's edit was from 4 days ago, blocking doesn't seem necessary. Jamie  S93  19:37, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions

 * All sockpuppets blocked and tagged except IP.  ceran  thor 19:41, 7 November 2009 (UTC)