Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fenopy/Archive

10 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Pratyya Ghosh1 (talk) 18:04, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * , please provide evidence for why you think Fenopy has engaged in sockpuppetry. Everymorning (talk) 18:19, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm suspecting that Pratyya may be the disruptive account. Created a complex userpage right out of the gate from account creation. This is within minutes of creating the account. Now, a couple of weeks later, he's placing speedy tags on articles that shouldn't be speedied. I've denied two. Considering the third. This account's also attempted to run for admin at RfA today. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:36, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Closed due to lack of evidence. The reporting editor has not provided any diffs to show that the accounts are the same, I've had a look through the edits from both editors and they do not resemble the same pattern to me. The only thing looking similar is the username which could be sheer coincidence.--5 albert square (talk) 20:39, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

CU confirmed, logging here for the record. Yunshui 雲 水 11:22, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ Yunshui 雲 水 11:22, 7 February 2019 (UTC)