Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fingerscronin/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Long history of disruptive editing on Tayforth Camanachd occurring over several years. User:Fingerscronin added some non-encyclopedic, unsourced material with, , , then various editors tried to edit out some of this material but it has been continually reintroduced. First with the Fingerscronin account: ,,, , which attracted some warnings on the user's talk page. Just over a week later other accounts were instead being used to reintroduce the same unsuitable material, a single edit from User:Samthevet: but mostly from the User:Shintyman account:, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,. Drchriswilliams (talk) 21:39, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I blocked Shintyman for edit warring (basically WP:NOTHERE). Other two account haven't edited in years, so there is nothing more to do. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:54, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

History over several years of non-encyclopaedic poorly-sourced material being repeatedly reinstated on Tayforth Camanachd at expense of sourced material. I brought this to SPI in September 2016 and the Shinyman account was blocked for being WP:NOTHERE. Today a further edit from Samthevetmans, a new account, follows the same pattern as before. Drchriswilliams (talk) 00:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. All four accounts have added the same line about a decline following the retirement of McMaster:, , ,. Some of the accounts are pretty old, but I've still blocked and tagged them. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:35, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Samthevetmansley is repeatedly adding the same pov content (and wrecking referenced content), with similar edit warring/unjustified revert pattern as Shintyman (previously blocked). Compare Samthevetmansley edit vs Shintyman edit; the diffs between those show restoration of essentially the same text with minor variations. Checkuser at admin/clerk discretion. Almost certainly the same deal as with the previous archived cases. Dl2000 (talk) 03:09, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Name overlap with was a clincher., closing. Cabayi (talk) 17:32, 10 June 2020 (UTC)