Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FirstCommandEducationalFoundation/Archive

13 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Made First Command Educational Foundation, then blanked, then another user re-added the blanked content. ToonLucas22 (talk) 21:23, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Yes, but what is the problem?  was blocked and allowed to create new account (see: User_talk:FirstCommandEducationalFoundation). What is wp:ILLEGITimate here?  Vanjagenije   (talk)  22:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * That was BEFORE the account was blocked. --ToonLucas22 (talk) 01:34, 14 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, was created before  was blocked and asked to create a new account, but the end result is the same (maybe the user realized he was violating our username policies before we warnblocked him?). There is no need to block for socking; of course, if copyvio/spam is continued from the new account, it can be warned and/or blocked as appropriate. ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  18:38, 16 March 2015 (UTC)