Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fishshaw/Archive

Evidence submitted by Kittins floating in the sky yay
Seems to be a throwaway account created just to revert edits on nationalism, see contributions. I know it says "Obvious, disruptive sock puppet 	Block. No checkuser is necessary. / Disruptive "throwaway" account used only for a few edits 	Block. No checkuser is necessary." in this form but I don't know where else would be best to get that done, it doesn't say? --Kittins floating in the sky yay (talk) 17:29, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I've been adding back the fact that nationalist political parties are well, nationalist, in their descriptions and supporters don't seem to like the word being used to describe it even though they support the politics because in the UK it has negative connotations, yet they ARE nationalist poltitical parties... I tried to fix this months ago and gave up because you basically have mob rule/bullying because the majority of people who visit such articles are looking it up because they support it... not sure how you can ever fix that and make such articles unbiased really... if you look on Talk:Plaid Cymru at the bottom you'll see them congratulating each other on reverting and removing NPOV tags, with userpages with flags all over the place... --Kittins floating in the sky yay (talk) 17:37, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Kittins floating in the sky yay (talk) 17:29, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

no evidence presented to show that this user is acting in violation of WP:SOCK, i.e. that they are operating multiple accounts abusively. I suggest that you discuss your concerns with the user directly. You may also wish to review WP:EW. Kind regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 17:37, 5 May 2010 (UTC)