Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Flammable monky/Archive

16 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

An obvious sock is obvious Muboshgu (talk) 03:12, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:DUCK - sleeper check? -- Addi hockey  10  e-mail 03:16, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, please. And (1) an indefinite block for the sockmaster, who I believe is still blocked for only one month, and (2) an IP block would be nice too, if possible. --Muboshgu (talk) 03:30, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Sorry, I'm declining the CU (and closing this case) because I don't see justification for a checkuser. Also I'm not seeing a reason why this is a duck case. There's definitely not justification for an IP block here, and as this is the main account's first sockpuppeting/block, I don't see a reason to indef it. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:08, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Even though the sock is clearly vandalism-only? --Muboshgu (talk) 04:16, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Another admin saw fit to make it only a month. I'm not going to override another admin's block. You can take it to them if you'd like, however. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 05:01, 16 January 2011 (UTC)