Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Focuscleanup/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Compare and : basically the same edit, and the summary of the latter is a response to the reversion of the former.

Also compare and : both exhibit lack of understanding of markup and how talk pages work, in addition to "IMDB listings" (the correct spelling is "IMDb") and "ALL CAPS". Compare While I understand your interpretation of the surname, the title itself has more than one possible interpretation and Yes, the name refers to the last name of the titular character, but it refers to other things in the film itself, and note the lack of citation to a reliable source or a statement of what those things are.

FWIW, Focuscleanup hasn't reponded to the COI notice on their talk page. Nardog (talk) 17:24, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The activity of these two accounts do not overlap in time. Generally, we are willing to extend some leniency to new editors who decide they want a different username and create a new account and abandon an old one—as long as they do not actively deceive editors by masquerading as multiple people, this is not necessarily a violation of the sockpuppetry policy. I've left uw-agf-sock on both editors' user talk pages. Please re-report if you suspect that this user is continuing to misuse multiple accounts. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 21:19, 4 June 2022 (UTC)