Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FokkerTISM/Archive

30 September 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I.P socks continue to make the same unsourced changes at Chrissy Amphlett, see 1, 2, 3. ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   11:20, 30 September 2013 (UTC) The I.P addresses have made changes only to the same article, and only relating to dates that are contested without source by User:FokkerTISM. ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   11:30, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Please understand this - the two IPs are NOT me. FokkerTISM 11:24, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Why do people think that "person who thinks Chrissy's birthdate is 1954 = Fokker"? FokkerTISM 11:26, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Sorry folks but Fokker is not a Sockpuppet. I made the change after Fokker and standby the truth. Not here to abuse anybody just here to let the truth be told. btw I have got confirmation from someone VERY CLOSE to Chrissy she was not born in 1959. Happy to share it via a disposable email address but not willing to publish it. It will flow you away if you see the screen shot of who sent it to me. Regards Chestnut.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * While I suspect the relationship here is correct, it is unfortunate that this case took so long to get around to. There's not much purpose to blocking the IPs which now have no activity, and a sockmaster block would normally be 1 week which would have expired by now. I believe the correct course of action is to simply close this case, and FokkerTISM is clearly quite aware that these actions are inappropriate, so should they continue further an indef block would be in order. Closing case with no action. Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 19:30, 12 October 2013 (UTC)