Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Foobarrion/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

A handful of new accounts who first make their user/user talk blue (Special:diff/963802610, Special:diff/963812436, Special:diff/966405919, Special:diff/963995458, Special:diff/966247891) before making changes to MicroVision, Inc.. I'm sure Foobarrion isn't the oldest account out there, so I'm requesting CU. Sro23 (talk) 23:22, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please check for any missed accounts. I have a feeling this is another paid editing ring. Sro23 (talk) 23:23, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * - TonyBallioni (talk) 23:43, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅ to one another:
 * The following is
 * The following accounts are / to the above and to one another:
 * There's also another account that could be with the confirmed group. Anyway, I think this is an LTA, not a paid editor, so on the confirmed and likely. Sro23, up to you what to do with the name of this case and whether or not to block the second group. Proxies are involved, but the first group had one main device and the second group doesn't use it. That being said, at least one of the accounts in the first group had access to multiple devices. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:02, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The following is
 * The following accounts are / to the above and to one another:
 * There's also another account that could be with the confirmed group. Anyway, I think this is an LTA, not a paid editor, so on the confirmed and likely. Sro23, up to you what to do with the name of this case and whether or not to block the second group. Proxies are involved, but the first group had one main device and the second group doesn't use it. That being said, at least one of the accounts in the first group had access to multiple devices. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:02, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The following is
 * The following accounts are / to the above and to one another:
 * There's also another account that could be with the confirmed group. Anyway, I think this is an LTA, not a paid editor, so on the confirmed and likely. Sro23, up to you what to do with the name of this case and whether or not to block the second group. Proxies are involved, but the first group had one main device and the second group doesn't use it. That being said, at least one of the accounts in the first group had access to multiple devices. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:02, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * There's also another account that could be with the confirmed group. Anyway, I think this is an LTA, not a paid editor, so on the confirmed and likely. Sro23, up to you what to do with the name of this case and whether or not to block the second group. Proxies are involved, but the first group had one main device and the second group doesn't use it. That being said, at least one of the accounts in the first group had access to multiple devices. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:02, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * There's also another account that could be with the confirmed group. Anyway, I think this is an LTA, not a paid editor, so on the confirmed and likely. Sro23, up to you what to do with the name of this case and whether or not to block the second group. Proxies are involved, but the first group had one main device and the second group doesn't use it. That being said, at least one of the accounts in the first group had access to multiple devices. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:02, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * There's also another account that could be with the confirmed group. Anyway, I think this is an LTA, not a paid editor, so on the confirmed and likely. Sro23, up to you what to do with the name of this case and whether or not to block the second group. Proxies are involved, but the first group had one main device and the second group doesn't use it. That being said, at least one of the accounts in the first group had access to multiple devices. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:02, 9 July 2020 (UTC)


 * I think I'll leave the second group alone, since they haven't edited in a couple weeks. I suppose if they reactive later then they can be blocked. Also, since this is probably an LTA the name of this case shouldn't matter so much, per DENY. Closing. Sro23 (talk) 00:10, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , as an FYI, I just blocked Foobarrion after they reverted my reversion of the socks. Using the same device as the first group according to the more recent data. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:46, 9 July 2020 (UTC)