Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fordx12/Archive

11 October 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

i)Firstly thanks for your valuable time. User Fordx12 has had consistent loggins throughout much of September. However, user takes a 4 day hiatus starting September 23. Upon returning on September 27, a pretty well informed new user Bravoq (sock1) also coincidentally logs in. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=La_Luz_del_Mundo&dir=prev&offset=20120924051503&action=history User ajaxfiore (sock2) is utilized to sway opinion towards Fordx12's disposition by slandering an author's curriculum vitae and credibility http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:La_Luz_del_Mundo#Dr._Jorge_Erdely

ii)Recently, Fordx12 has made attempts to do away with the controversy section of La Luz Del Mundo. I do believe the user to be attempting to avoid scrutiny by creating Bravoq and blanking a section in the controversy section http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=La_Luz_del_Mundo&diff=prev&oldid=514839118 Furthermore, in the talk section ajaxfiore serves as a means to create illusory support.

iii)In the Talk section, user has already incriminated him/herself by stating that in regards to the controversy section, user "would like for it to go away". If it makes any difference, this same user also stated that he/she "believes that Samuel Joaquin is an Apostle of God" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:La_Luz_del_Mundo It is crucial that CheckUser be utilized so that the controversy remain  protected in case of future erasures, ultimately ensuring to provide a balanced perspective to this little known page. Thanks again for your time. RidjalA (talk) 08:46, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm sorry, but I don't see the normal overlap that is the hallmark of socking. They have both been involved with the article for a long time, sometimes in the same thread, sometimes not, usually agreeing but different nuances.  I can't duck block or justify a CU at this point.  Closing for lack of evidence. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 00:54, 12 October 2012 (UTC)