Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fox53/Archive

23 November 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:18, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Its the same guy. I've had more than one go with him. He just doesn't get it. Wiggy! (talk) 03:59, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I can confirm Wiggy's statement as I met him under similar circumstances. There is more of his history under Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Fox53 and Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Fox53. His edit pattern is all to stereotipical also, nowadays, he doesn't seem quite as aggresive anymore. Calistemon (talk) 11:49, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blusts is a ✅ match with . They quack like the master (obviously hence why I checked) and I would endorse blocking. WilliamH (talk) 21:38, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Both socks blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:51, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

29 July 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Blocked on Commons as a sock of User:Kay Körner, who is blocked here as a sock of User:Fox53; copyvios on Commons, tendentious editing with nationalist hate aspects at Dresden English Football Club and at related image uploads including File:Only proof for DEFC 1.jpg similar to characterization of edits by sockmaster and of Kay Körner here, referred to in the Kay Körner userpage notice. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:27, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm not sure how thoroughly we want to revert his edits. I did look through the archives and the behavior is spot on between the ancient pre 2008 Fox53 socks and Wikipediohacker. This combined with the Commons block makes it a duck case for me. The only thing that remains is how much of what he did should be reverted. The Dresden English Football Club article was terrible, but some work has gone into fixing it, and it is notable. NativeForeigner Talk 20:09, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm closing this. The article is currently headed for keep at AFD, which will obviously preclude any G5 speedy deletions. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:02, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

12 September 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

His interest for all things related to SV Dynamo and the city of Dresden together with lines like Westgerman spies here want to delete this article and Ultras Dynamo is being censored in all internet archives in NATO areas  indicates to me multi-indef blocked user User:Fox53 (also User:Kay Körner) could be back again. The broken English, hatred for West Germans and obsession with Dynamo is something that makes me think Conformuser could be Kay Körner. Calistemon (talk) 12:49, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Even if this user isn't Fox53 - and I'm inclined to say they are - then their editing behaviour and nonsensical rants are leading me to call for an indef block per WP:NOTHERE. GiantSnowman 13:12, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I am sure this is Kay Körner or Fox53. Always included are Dynamo Dresden and this strange conspiracy theory diff. He holds a copy of User:Wikipediohackers original version of Dresden English Football Club in his userspace . --Ben Ben (talk) 16:43, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * – blocked indefinitely and case marked for close. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 00:18, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

09 October 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User:Nikebrand makes the same bizarre accusations, like that User:MbahGondrong is permanently disturbing as paid milita as User:Conformuser,. They are both primarily interested in association football in the German state of Saxony. Both edit in the same broken English and both call edits that contradict their believes discrimination. In less then two weeks this account has been editing it already has been blocked twice for Edit warring. Calistemon (talk) 11:43, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I agree this is a case of WP:DUCK but in the spirit of AGF a formal CU should be completed. Either way, this new user is disruptive. GiantSnowman 11:59, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * If you believe the behavioural evidence is strong enough to make a WP:DUCK block, please do so. There is no technical evidence available for comparison CU-wise as hasn't edited since 2013 and is therefore .-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  18:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ GiantSnowman 19:10, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Note, Nikebrand was renamed to Nikegoddess (which GiantSnowman blocked). After being blocked, the same user logged back in to the renamed account and continued editing, so I've blocked the Nikebrand account as well. Mike V  •  Talk  20:15, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry folks, appears that I shouldn't have done the rename... anyway, this should be merged with Fox53 as that's what Conformuser was blocked as a sock of. --Rschen7754 03:02, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

31 October 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Nukefirestadium has the same aggressive way of acting as earlier incarnations of Fox53 had. Without any valid reasoning he removes maintenance templates as no reason proven or vandalism. Just like the incarnation Conformuser he uses multiple YouTube-clips as sources. Nukefirestadium confirms his tie with SV Dynamo here and also has the same strange conspiracy theories about the Stasi.

Remarkable is also the fact that Nukefirestadium attacks me for being Dutch, just as other incarnations attacked other people for being non-East-Germans.

Please notice that the account was created on 11 October, two days after the last known incarnation was blocked. The Banner talk 14:30, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Seconding this request and adding: conspiracy theory here and an early edit to Dresden English Football Club, an article of particular interest to Fox53. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ to . -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  16:58, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I've indeffed the new account. Because Nikebrand was never confirmed, I've tagged the new account as suspected. I've also changed the Nikebrand tag to point to Fox53 instead of Conformuser.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

05 November 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * - added for comparison purposes
 * - added for comparison purposes


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I suspect User:Radionete may be another sock of Fox53. User:Radionete/sandbox contains a copy of the Central Stadium (Leipzig, GDR), an article the previous sock of Fox53, User:Nukefirestadium was heavily involved in. The only main space edit of the new account is also on a subject that the previous sock was involved with. Calistemon (talk) 04:22, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I think this should be added to the behavioral evidence. Yngvadottir (talk) 04:33, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
There is other behavioral evidence: the images on Radionete's user page just like Nukefirestadium and the timing of the accounts. Nuke was blocked on October 31, and Radionete was created on November 2. I'd appreciate it,, if you'd clarify your comment. Your diff without any connection to the master or another blocked sock doesn't tell me much. Usually, you'd provide two diffs to make that connection, or at least an explanation. In the interim, I'm endorsing a CU, although there's probably enough to block here based on duck.--Bbb23 (talk) 05:57, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are.
 * . PhilKnight (talk) 12:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * . PhilKnight (talk) 12:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * . PhilKnight (talk) 12:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

17 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

With the promotion of Dynamo Dresden to the 2. Bundesliga Conformuser, formerly Fox53, formerly Kai Körner, has become active again, adding large amount of content on the fan group Ultras to the article. Please see this diff and compare to Articles for deletion/Ultras Dynamo and Talk:Dynamo Dresden for evidence. Calistemon (talk) 03:55, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Please see this diff from September 2013 by Conformuser which is very similar to today's diff. Calistemon (talk) 04:07, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  15:53, 18 April 2016 (UTC)