Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Frederico1234/Archive

Evidence submitted by Jiujitsuguy
Frederico1234 made this edit and I reverted it. With in minutes of the revert, IP user 209.118.181.16 reverted me here to the last version by Frederico1234. The IP was stale, not having made an edit since May 11. Futhermore the IP was very familiar with the edit by Frederico and indicated that the issue should be discussed at the Talk Page. Shortly thereafter, Frederico1234 made a comment here on the talk page. Seems like the IP and Frederico1234 are one and the same and he used the IP to circumvent potential 3R violation.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 18:45, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
The IP is not me. Furthermore, I was never informed of this investigation. --Frederico1234 (talk) 12:05, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Looks like a fishing expedition. No rules have been broken even if they turn out to be the same person. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 22:32, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Insufficient evidence to justify a finding of socking, let alone a block. Closing as no action. Tim Song (talk) 22:36, 1 June 2010 (UTC)