Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Frozenfool/Archive

Report date December 8 2009, 09:55 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Reconsider !  09:55, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Reconsider  !


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

User:Frozenfool is the older account, actually. Also consider:
 * Comments by other users



All seem quite duckish to me. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 10:11, 8 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

123.243.172.110 also blocked 3 months. Everyone else already indefinitely blocked and tagged. MuZemike 17:34, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

Evidence submitted by Polargeo
Started apparent hoax page with this edit on Urinade with reference to probable previous account User:Frozenfool in article. No attempt to hide link to previous indef blocked account in the chosen username. Polargeo (talk) 14:40, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
I recommend blocking the account, SpitfireTally-ho! 14:49, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, this SPI isn't necessary. Obvious vandals. Block on sight and forget it. Tan   &#124;   39  14:51, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Account has been indef blocked for vandalism Polargeo (talk) 14:51, 10 February 2010 (UTC)