Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fu1475369/Archive

18 March 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Blatantly obvious sockpuppetry: a brand new account is defending the master's article, Young cell, removing CSD tags and posting on the talk page. Since the master has been around since 2014 with no apparent activity, I am requesting CU to find any possible sleepers. GABHello! 16:24, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Diffs: . GABHello! 16:27, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
 * My apologies if you do not believe it's necessary. I requested due to the AFD open, as well as the fact that the suspected master had been around for over nearly 2 years (since April 2014) with no apparent activity whatsoever until March 19, leading me to suspect sleepers. Thank you, GABHello! 00:37, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please, compare those two.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  00:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * - GAB's request was for a sleeper check, but I don't see any evidence to suggest that sleepers may exist. As for the endorsement to compare the accounts, CU is unnecessary in cases of "blatantly obvious sockpuppetry". I therefore can see no justification for a check. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:44, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * (or any other admin clerk) I didn't see anything suggestive of sleepers, but please look at the AfD linked above and the accounts' live and deleted edits in case I missed something. Thanks ​—DoRD (talk)​ 00:47, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Sock indeffed, master blocked for a week. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  01:02, 24 March 2016 (UTC)