Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Futurepilot1999/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Obviously not a new user. Editing in a similar way and on some of the same articles concentrating on Scotland and airport topics. Andrewgprout (talk) 17:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' This appears like a personal attack against myself. This user isn't liking my edits for one reason or another. Maybe because he always likes to be "Mr Right". UKAviator89 (talk) 18:10, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

You have only been editing for less than a day I have reverted only a couple of your edits I don't see how there has been enough time for you to form any opinion about me, I resent your accusation that there has been any personal attack on you. Andrewgprout (talk) 19:39, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ + . Blocked UKAviator89 and tagged all. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:54, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

sockpuppet of serial banned user Futurepilot1999 - same old editing style Andrewgprout (talk) 21:17, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * per airport edits. There's no way it isn't a puppet. However, I do want to point out that many edits he/she made are current, with small number edits that are sometimes sourced, so it may be IGF now. Tessaract2 Talk 13:01, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
, but it's easier to work on these reports when there's evidence in the form of diffs provided. Comparing the edit histories, this does look like a sock. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:43, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User edits are made in a similar manner to that of the blocked sock master. User edit summaries, edit warring methods and the way the new user used airline websites as sources is identical. I've tried to bring inform the new user to bring their edits up to Wikipedia standards but they have not. Please checkuser here. Garretka (talk) 10:40, 30 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Absolutely, as requested:

The use of punctuation when trying to get their point across below: RgSim diffs: Special:diff/810131976 Special:diff/810273139 Special:diff/808883705 Compared with previous confirmed sock UkAviator: Special:diff/789431420

More: RgSim Special:diff/808828441 special:diff/808828095 Combine with previous sock master edits: Special:diff/788328456 And previous confirmed sock Special:diff/789474005

More: RgSim Special:diff/810743623 Special:diff/810739380 Futurepilot1999 Special:diff/787632437

If you want more let me know. Looking through the edit summaries of all confirmed socks, sock master, and current suspect, one can draw numerous comparisons. Also in the edit subject and edited pages. Garretka (talk) 23:37, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Just to note I have independently also come to the conclusion rgsim is a sockpuppet of the earlier succession of banned editors. I suspect you will find rgsim’s IP addresses georesolve to Fife, Scotland.Andrewgprout (talk) 04:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
 * 1) At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
 * 2) At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
 * 3) In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  20:53, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * - Can you check this user based on the CU logs from July?  Vanjagenije   (talk)  19:16, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:36, 1 December 2017 (UTC)