Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fydcinnz/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility


 * Six areas of intersection, all seem focused on elderly people, with emphasis on centenarians.
 * TGBCT1 should probably be indeffed on general principle, as this account appears to be an impostor account of editor who edits in the world of centenarian articles, and who has denied having an alternate account.
 * TGBCT1 account was created September 1, 2017. This was about 8 days after Fydcinnz was indeffed for disruptive editing.
 * Fydcinnz uses the odd phrasing "limbo case" in edit summaries a good deal I guess these are people who haven't officially been designated centenarians or supercentenarians or something. TGBCT1 did it here.
 * Fydcinnz urges "please check the 110 club for details" (and similar edit summaries). TGBCT1 does the same
 * Both refer to Wikipedia as "wiki" (typically lowercase). Fydcinnz, TGBCT1
 * Fydcinnz has edited this article, about an Indian film actress in her 80s. This article about an Indian film actor in his 50s. And this article about an Indian film actress in her 40s. Implication: He's interested in Indian film stars. TGBCT1 has similarly edited article of Indian film stars here and here and here, often dealing with ages and birthdates, as Fydcinnz has.

Since these are fairly superficial links between the two, and I'm not sure if maybe there is certain jargon shared among people who track centenarians, I'm not 100% confident to block as a duck. Would appreciate a CU eyeball. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 09:13, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Unfortunately, Fydcinnz went stale in November, so behavioral evidence will have to suffice. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:11, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * However, CU logs show them on the same (very busy) ISP in the same geolocation. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:16, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Combined with the behavioral evidence, this is clearly a sock. . GABgab 15:45, 29 December 2017 (UTC)