Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/G2gg-8g40/Archive

20 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * It is me! User:ColourWolf! I'm back to wreck havoc again! This time I announced I have introduced inaccuracies to an obscure page on Wikipedia! Good luck blocking you f'king mor0N5. XD




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

*Moved sock postings not related -- DQ  (t)  (e)  17:40, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Should be pretty clear that these are one and the same. The first three came directly to my talk page within a few minutes of one another and trashed it. The other two showed up in the blocked users' list. Don't know who the original puppetmaster is, but I'd like to investigate the possibility of finding out and blocking the range(s) if possible. PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:40, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

PS: That third sock has threatened that he is on an "unblockable" range. I suspect that more attacks are coming. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:45, 20 December 2010 (UTC


 * It is me! User:ColourWolf! I'm back to wreck havoc again! This time I announced I have introduced inaccuracies to an obscure page on Wikipedia! Good luck blocking you f'king mor0N5. XD — Preceding unsigned comment added by NarcissistAntithesis (talk • contribs) 16:02, 20 December 2010


 * It would appear that someone isn't having a very good Christmas vacation...--PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

One of these socks boasted about a range of 218.186.0.0/16 FWIW. Found the "obscure vandalism" as well. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:13, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ the following:
 * - Socks are stacking by the minute. Probally more accounts. -- DQ  (t)  (e)  15:57, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 16:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 16:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 16:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 16:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 16:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 16:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 16:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 16:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 16:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 16:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 16:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 16:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 16:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 16:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 16:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 16:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 16:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 16:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 16:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 16:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

I'm about ready to unblock the underlying IP range due to excessive collateral damage. There is nothing we can do here. –MuZemike 17:22, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. We'll have to see how it goes, I suppose. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  17:25, 20 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Well they are all blocked, relevant ones tagged. Let us know of any other ones. -- DQ  (t)  (e)  17:41, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, fellas. Much obliged.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 21:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)