Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gabnite/Archive

23 July 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The contributions of convinced me that the user is the same as  and. I recently encountered when I noticed their incessant creation of articles related to Afe Babalola University with an intention to promote the new private university. I saw this and stubify it as this. I never noticed their disruptive behavior until i saw this article] again and the earlier version was deleted as a WP:copyvio. I redirected the new version to Emmanuel Afe Babalola. I later saw the creation of] Abiodun Ayodele Ojo by the same user and I suspected them of a WP:COI. I confirmed the WP:COI and their promotional motive on Wikipedia following this image addition with a caption "Reader at Afe Babalola University" instead of "Former Chief Judge of Ondo State". In lieu of this, I left a note on their talk page, User talk:Gabnite, advising them to declared any possible COI in connection with "Afe Babalola University". I later saw this yesterday and today came across a new account, who created Gbenga Oluwasola Oyewole that reads like this "Gbenga Oyewole (Born Gbenga Oluwasola Oyewole) is a Nigerian web developer, social media expert, online public relation official and entrepreneur. He is best known as the founder and chairman/ceo of Gabnite Inc. Note founder and chairman/ceo of Gabnite Inc. which simply suggest that  is Gbenga Oluwasola Oyewole and the same person as  and . I want a Checkuser to look into this. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 23:18, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Per provided evidence.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  00:13, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * The three accounts are ✅. Blocked and tagged all, including the master. I see nothing constructive from these accounts except disruption and promotion. I also found the master's statement on their userpage ostensibly disclosing another account to be lacking in credibility, false, and certainly belied by the edits and by the use of yet a second sock account. Even if both sock accounts were disclosed, the accounts are not legitimate. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:12, 25 July 2015 (UTC)