Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gadeshina33/Archive

Evidence submitted by Kww
Beyond obvious WP:DUCK. Gadeshina33's last edit was vandalism to her talk page, which I reverted. Gadeshina44's first edit was to revert one of my edits 10 minutes later.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:43, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
I don't know if it's that obvious... :) –MuZemike 02:37, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Kww
Pretty obvious sequence from Gadeshina33 and Gadeshina44. Requesting checkuser because it's apparent that some level of IP blocking is desirable to prevent future socking.&mdash;Kww(talk) 23:13, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by &mdash;Kww(talk) 23:13, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

I've blocked the account as an obvious sockpuppet; I'd agree with Kww's request for a checkuser for potential IP blocking. ~ mazca  talk 20:36, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

obvious duck. Would appreciate any possible IP blocks and a check for sleepers. Thanks SpitfireTally-ho! 21:56, 18 March 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅ - for a short while -  A l is o n  ❤ 06:18, 20 March 2010 (UTC)