Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gala19000/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Gala19000 was blocked as arb enforcement for 1 year by on May 28, 2016. Nuclearcanadian was created on May 28, 2016. This is the same day that the 1-week block by EdJohnston expired. Nuclearcanadian was created at 17:43, made one edit to revert Oatitonimly at 17:44, and then Gala19000 resumed editing at 18:03. Further note that the 1-week ban was meted out with the summary "Violation of your ban and abuse of multiple accounts" by EdJohnston.

Gala19000 has a vendetta against, as seen in this WP:AE filing made against them:. Nuclearcanadian is hounding Oatitonimly from the very first edit.

Gala19000 has said that Oatitonimly is reverting because they are Armenian (see User_talk:Gala19000 and User_talk:Gala19000 and this edit summary). Nuclearcanadian made the same complaint on my talk page in response to my warning regarding HOUND.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 19:36, 6 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Helps if I can spell correctly.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 19:31, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I'm surprised tbh, but appreciate you looking into. Cheers!  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 21:00, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The two accounts are ❌.
 * is the account referred to by . That account is ✅. I’ve tagged the master and the sock. However, because Ed took the socking into account in his year-long block of the master, it would be unreasonable to increase the master’s block. Closing with no further action.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The new user MAMODIVIC just appeared and started to reverse my edits. EkoGraf has received a lot of "Barnstars" from sockpuppets and it could be that MAMODIVIC is very likely one of EkoGraf's sockpuppet accounts. Ferakp (talk) 13:08, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I would just want to say a few things in my defense. First, to the administrator it may concern, you should check the edit history of Kurdish–Turkish conflict (1978–present) and the article's talk page. Editor Ferakp has engaged in an edit war with user MAMODIVIC, with Ferakp violating 3RR and MAMODIVIC being on the brink of violating 3RR but not fully. I engaged in the discussion and edits in the last few days. During these discussions, I warned both of them of 3RR and that they could be blocked (especially Ferakp) and should cool off. And apparently now, since my train of thought is more similar to MAMODIVIC in regards to the edits, Ferakp has accused me of being his sockpuppet master, which I find highly in bad faith. He's said that his accusation stems from sockpuppets of editors that were blocked in the past granting me barnstars before. Who or what gives me barnstars isn't my concern. EkoGraf (talk) 13:38, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Just because I came not for so a long time ago here on Wikipedia, doesn't mean that I'am a sockpuppet of anyone. And it looks like that this report has been made bacuse the user Ferakp doesn't agree with my and Ekograf's opinion/view of the edits/numbers (see casualties). Also, its quite sad to report something like this when you have no single proof, facts to show it. If you don't agree with someone else, or can't win/get your will in a discussion on the talk page, doesn't mean you get the right the report this/or these editors. Its very poor and weird to do so MAMODIVIC (MAMODIVIC) 13:54, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * MAMODIVIC is ✅ to . Blocked and tagged. I did not check EkoGraf because the bit of evidence presented was frivolous. Please move this case to a new one with Hakan3400 as the master. Unfortunately, I suspect we may be seeing more of their puppets in the future.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅, closing. GABgab 15:37, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Per 's request.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  14:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Bzaatronto is ✅ and blocked. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:05, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.


 * As below. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:43, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ to checkuser-blocked Gala19000 sock . Checked and noting for the record.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:43, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same usernames:
 * "Ottomanwarrior12991923" (new sock)
 * "OttomanWarrior1299" (CU blocked sock)

Spreading pro-Turkish/Otttoman content on Armenian, Iranian, Balkan, etc. articles:
 * Ottomanwarrior12991923: Changed "Ottoman victory" into "decisive Ottoman victory"
 * Ottomanwarrior12991923: Removed Ottoman casualties
 * OttomanWarrior1299: Changed "Persian relative victory" into "indecisive"

'''Decreased Ottoman figures on Battle of Keresztes:
 * Ottomanwarrior12991923
 * OttomanWarrior1299

- LouisAragon (talk) 22:19, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:11, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Like his older socks, see history. he deletes sources/contents about turkish/ottoman casualties and losses and he only do edits at same pages like his old socks.

He deletes Turkish losses 

And he edit same pages  Like his other sock  Shadow4dark (talk) 09:33, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Extremely technical match and obvious behavioural match. Blocked and tagged.--  Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:32, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: they have various dynamic IP ranges at their disposal, so I would expect they'll pop up again in short order.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:33, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both edit articles related to Turkey (the country, not the bird). Both have a tendency to say "plz use the talk page" or some other variety. See this edit: where User:Mr.User200 clearly has an explanation for their removal of content but User:Maistara says "see talk page". Same with User:Gala19000 here. Gala says "Please use the talk page before ever reverting it back.". These two edit summaries indicate that they almost have to be the same person. Another piece of evidence is at WP:ANI. Mr.User200 suggests that User:Gala19000 and User:Maistara are the same person. {&#123;31&#125;} {&#123;25A (talk)&#125;} 16:09, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

I request CheckUser: I've changed my choice now. I've realized that there is clear evidence, mostly from User:Mr.User200 that User:Maistara and User:Gala19000 are the same user, not directly, but mostly from User:Maskalaeuba. {&#123;31&#125;} {&#123;25A (talk)&#125;} 19:13, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1) 2019–20 Western Libya campaign A) SockPuppet User:Gal17928 a secundary SP of User:Gala19000. Edited and commented that Turkish Drones used in Lybia were GNA operated despite some sources they were Turkish operated. First, Second, Thrid

B) Same behaviour. Here on Turkish drones and Here too

2) Turkish aircraft lost reported as claims" : Bayraktar Tactical UAS A) Use of "Claim" in edit Summaries by User:Gal17928 a secundary SP of User:Gala19000.Claims, Errasing Info.

B) Same behaviour in editor. Here

3) Reverting/errasing Russian role in 2020 Balyun airstrikes A) SockPuppet User:Maskalaeuba Here B) This user, same behaviour same edit summary. Here

4) List of wars involving Turkey & Talk:List of wars involving Turkey A) Banned SP: User:Maskalaeuba errased content (POV) regarding the Operation Spring Shiled Result Here Commented and unsuccesfully teamed with User:Beshogur to revert my edits Here. On Adminboard, I was blocked for 1 week for 3RR; reverting a Sock (Maskalaeuba). The Report was made by Beshogur and both were editing the same.

A Admin wrote "for a period of one week. @Beshogur: You are incorrect. Maskalaeuba, who is indeed a sock (now blocked by me), did not blank the page. M's edits agree with yours. M and Mr.User200 were the principal edit warriors. Unfortunately, Mr.User200 did not revert just twice, but three times, at a 1RR article, and the editor has a history of edit-warring, and although they were edit-warring with a sock, they were also effectively edit-warring with other editors who did not violate 1RR."

B) This new user tries to team up with User:Beshogur again Here

5) Edit Behaviour: A) Pages edited by this banned Sockpuppets:
 * Operation Spring Shield - By User:Maskalaeuba and User:Nabu-Kudurri-Usur Yaniv
 * List of wars involving Turkey - By User:Maskalaeuba and User.Gal17928
 * 2020 Balyun airstrikes - By User:Nabu-Kudurri-Usur Yaniv, User:Maskalaeuba and User:AlAboud83
 * Pantsir missile system - By User:李王陈柳 - User:Maskalaeuba, User:Ahhlanker and User:Nabu-Kudurri-Usur Yaniv and Anon IP
 * Northwestern Syria offensive (December 2019–March 2020) - By User:Nabu-Kudurri-Usur Yaniv,

B) By this new user, and how many times: Operation Spring Shield (58) List of wars involving Turkey (7) 2020 Balyun airstrikes (4) Bayraktar TB2 (5) Pantsir missile system (4) Northwestern Syria offensive (December 2019–March 2020) (3)

6)In the end this user is Maskaleuba. Here, see the name of the articles and the number of times, they were edited: Maskalaeuba Edits Maistara edits

Same articles same times.

Above is from User:Mr.User200. {&#123;31&#125;} {&#123;25A (talk)&#125;} 17:17, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

3 days ago I started with Wikipedia and now I am wrongly accused of being a sockpuppet of Gala19000, who I don’t even know. Just because I used to have edited the same sort of articles doesn’t mean that I am the same person of that sockpuppet?! The User: Mr.User200 clearly removed from much to all of my improved edits/content without any source nor clear explanation which can be seen in all those edits: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, Especialy here at 6, he just claims it as not reliable and then removes it all without even discussing it.

31 Says: ‘’See this edit: where User:Mr.User200 clearly has an explanation for their removal of content but User:Maistara says "see talk page".’’ This right here is completely wrong. He didn’t have any legitimate ‘’explanation’’ at all. He said in the talk page that the reason of removal was grammar and copyright. The copyrighted parts were already removed by another user which can be seen here (last edit of the user regarding copyright):. And after on the talk page I clearly explained him why I reverted it back, see here:. So in short, the User: Mr.User200 cleary didn’t remove copyrighted content, it was already removed. He just removed 80% of the article without any logical reason: 3. And as you can see in the talk page, he didn’t respond to neither of my comments. I realy expected more from the Wikipedia community regarding these edit war like situations. Now I am being accused of being both, the vandalizer and sockpuppet.

He literally removed almost all of my newly added content and then accuses me of things that I am clearly not doing, including being a alleged ‘’sockpuppet’’. He also didn’t respond to any of the talk pages where I clearly mentioned him several times but with no succes. And after this whole discussion he started to accuse me of being a sockpuppet to get out of this edits removal discussiong? Thats just sad and would be a big shame if I get wrongly blocked and he doesn’t. Anyway, I hope that this explained the situation well for whoever is reading it now. I started to like Wikipedia and had made great additions to the page of Operation Spring Shield as it was very empty, but it seems like some other editors just don’t want to work on it together and instead vandalize it, remove content and then accuse me of being a SP. Maistara (talk) 16:35, June 2020 (UTC)
 * No evidence to oppose. {&#123;31&#125;} {&#123;25A (talk)&#125;} 17:04, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 * This all above you is my evidence. Just because I use to have editted similiar pages of an sockpuppet of the past doesn’t mean that I am the same person? How does that even make a little bit of sense? By the way, I would have expected a bit of a more detailed response from you 31. You also accused me of several wrong things which I just explained above but you don’t seem to care about my response? Anyway, that doesn’t matter and I didn’t expect any right response from you anyway. I am not an sockpuppet and if I do get wrongly blocked I will contact with Wikipedia about this ridiculous claim about me and fill a complaint in. Maistara (talk) 17:10, June 2020 (UTC)
 * There is enought prof of the same editing behaviour between him and banned User:Maskalaeuba

Here, see the name of the articles and the number of times, they were edited. Maskalaeuba Edits Maistara edits Mr.User200 (talk) 17:20, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 * This is enough proof? How? Just because I am editting the more recent events of the world regarding Turkey’s military missions doesn’t make me a sockpuppet of someone else who did the same thing in the past. Your accusations are ridiculous and I almost feel like that you realy are doing this on purpose to have no editors who edit pages in a way that you don’t like. I’m editing the recent events that include Turkey’s military operations as do many other editors on pages Like Operation Claw-Eagle in Northern Iraq. How does this make me a sockpuppet? You know very wel that you were wrong on all the reverts you did on my edits. And now wrongly accuse me of a SP. Maistara (talk) 17:27, June 2020 (UTC)
 * Dude. It's just Wikipedia. should we request checkuser? {&#123;31&#125;} {&#123;25A (talk)&#125;} 18:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Indeed, its just Wikipedia and I would love to keep editing without getting disrupted like that and getting accused of being a SP. Thank you. Maistara (talk) 18:30, June 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, and check any link on this past Users

Mr.User200 (talk) 18:39, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
 * User:FPSTurkey
 * User:Maskalaeuba
 * User:Ahhlanker
 * User:Gala19000
 * User:Hakan3400
 * User:Türk260000
 * User:Kast-Meini
 * User:Hakan2600000
 * User:RandomAccount13343413
 * User:RandomAccount1235423
 * User:KasimMejia
 * User:Gilesartq
 * User:SyriaAnalyst
 * User:Nabu-Kudurri-Usur Yaniv
 * 110.168.30.203
 * 176.88.143.228
 * User:EdJohnsto.
 * User:Wolfgang Becker 1791
 * 李王陈柳
 * Hahaha, unbelievable. Once again, I am not related to any of these accounts. You two are getting more and more ridiculous and I’m sorry to say this, but this is just pathetic. I wonder if there is a page where I can report such behavior from you two. And if an administrator actualy agrees with this, well then I’m done. Anyway, if I do get suspended or something like that, I will just fill in a complaint to Wikipedia. This is just going too far now. Not sure wheter this is a joke now or serious. Maistara (talk) 19:33, June 2020 (UTC)

Guys...
This isn't going anywhere with all of us arguing. Can we at least get a clerk here? {&#123;31&#125;} {&#123;25A (talk)&#125;} 18:32, 21 June 2020 (UTC) The CheckUser should be made on User:Maskalaeuba not Gala19000.Mr.User200 (talk) 01:24, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Just a comment a new created account have been editing that pages after the block. Could be a fourth sock? Mr.User200 (talk) 12:51, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Likely SalahGood is sock Gala19000 always create a new user page and new users usually not. Shadow4dark (talk) 07:40, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Is this allowed at my talk page??Mr.User200 (talk) 13:50, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Any chance you can tag the user page as a sockpuppet while were at it? {&#123;3125A | talk &#125;} 12:21, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Could be just look at their edit count-

Maistara edits - SalaGood edits. Mr.User200 (talk) 14:12, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I've blocked: who are confirmed to each other, and to: -- zzuuzz (talk) 07:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * , and
 * Closing -- The SandDoctor Talk 19:01, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User:SalahGood and confirmed sock User:Maistara (which I'll be getting most of my investigation from) are hostile to User:Mr.User200 and frequently exit Operation Spring Shield.,,. These edits of User:SalahGood are all largely reverts of the edits made by User:Mr.User200 and all about Turkish military vehicle losses. User:Maistara can be seen here also saying:. I'm using User:Maistara as a stepping stone to this sockpuppet investigation.

Also, User:SalahGood claims to not be a sockpuppet so there is a chance that User:SalahGood is just User:Maistara's practical ally. But there is also a good chance that they are the same person.

Another evidence is that they both (SalahGood and Maistara) create a user page always. (Now, I know that User:SalahGood will probably defend harshly, based on what Maistara did in the last sockpuppet investigation.) {&#123;3125A &#124; talk &#125;} 21:26, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * User:SalahGood with a a account of 72 hours of created, is reverting and disruptive editing Turkish related articles, the same way User:Maistara (a proven Sock of User:Gala1900 did). There is a investigation of Sockpuppetry in this case.

Both editors dit the same articles and have the same POV pushing.

During the investigation me and another editors, were warned that User:SalahGood was likely a Gala1900 Sockpuppet here.

Most conveniently a SPI investigation was caried out and 3 accounts were blocked by a admin at: who were confirmed to each other, and to:
 * - Sockpuppet that reverted my edits.
 * - SockPuppet of Gal17928 - Blocked at 06:53, 22 June 2020
 * - A sleeper account of Maistara with no edits, (to revert later.)
 * - SP
 * - SP

SalahGood account was created at 09:38, 22 June 2020 and all his/her edits were to restore Maistara edits.

See here: Maistara edits (Blocked SP) - SalaGood edits.

Even more, the same time User:Maistara complained my edits, User:SalahGood was reverted all my edits. Maistara complains about my edits and call me False SalahGood revert my edits. 1 revert 2 revert 3 revert 4 revert

The SPI Check ended before SalahGood account was created, the investigation was not filed yet, and i requested to include SalahGood, because he was reverting back all Maistara edits after he was blocked.
 * SalahGood is already blocked. Can an admin close this? {&#123;3125A &#124; talk &#125;} 16:40, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Closing per the above as the case is rather moot. -- The SandDoctor Talk 19:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * (Already Blocked)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Seems Sockpuppet SalahGood have returned.

The new likely sock account is GoldyMcDonald. See here he have been reverting content to his POV once again.

The IPs and users have been using the same language and editing the same pages Libyan Civil War related pages and Turkish HISAR equiptement.

User GoldyMcDonald edits: https://xtools.wmflabs.org/topedits/en.wikipedia.org/GoldyMcDonald/0

176.88.143.228 Generic IP related to GoldyMc Donald edits: https://xtools.wmflabs.org/topedits/en.wikipedia.org/176.88.143.228/0

Proven Sockpuppet Gal 17928 edits https://xtools.wmflabs.org/topedits/en.wikipedia.org/Gal17928/0

GoldyMc Donald calling "weird Russian Site" on lostarmour.com https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Central_Libya_offensive_(2020)&diff=prev&oldid=976297808

Anon IP 176.88.136.86 requesting lostarmour.com to be blacklisted at RSN

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=979357576

Proven Sock Puppet SalahGood errasing Turkish losses from battlebox and calling "weird Russian" source on lostarmour.com

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Operation_Spring_Shield&diff=964233424&oldid=964232941

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Operation_Spring_Shield&diff=964232941&oldid=964232759

GoldyMc Donald reverting Shadow4dark edits https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/82.222.235.238

Check User 82.222.235.238 reverting Shadow4dark edits https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Operations_Claw-Eagle_and_Tiger&diff=prev&oldid=965602238

Check User 82.222.235.238 reverting Shadow4dark edits https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khalifa_Haftar&diff=prev&oldid=965648061 Mr.User200 (talk) 00:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * More proofs from today edits;

GoldyMcDonald threatening other users of block here

Proven Sock Gala19000 doing the same Once. Twice

User GoldyMcDonal hates Armenians: Here

Proven Sock Gala19000 on Armenians. Here

GoldyMcDonald get blocked for insulting Administrators and inmediately a new User without userpage request edition iwith POV style on 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict (Younghistorian19) adding on CU check. Mr.User200 (talk) 15:11, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * New created account Resapp comments and acuse of disruptive behaviour the same article the previous SP GoldyMcDonald edited. 2020 Nagorko Kabarakh clashes. With just a months of account creation he knows how English Wikipedia works.Mr.User200 (talk) 13:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Gala19000 is known for change Turkish related victories in "decisive victory" as seen above eddit. Shadow4dark (talk) 00:44, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * He also like to dismiss the fact that Turkish drones are shot down in conflicts.

Proven Sock User:Gal17928 Here Sospected Sockpuppet User:GoldyMcDonald Here Mr.User200 (talk) 02:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Note that I have blocked GoldyMcDonald on behavioral evidence.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:36, 27 September 2020 (UTC)


 * but as for the non-stale accounts they are ✅ to Sockpuppet investigations/RandomAccount1235423.  Maxim (talk)  15:31, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , Just to confirm, you want a clerk to move GoldyMcDonald and Younghistorian19 to Sockpuppet investigations/RandomAccount1235423, and re-tag Goldy? -- RoySmith (talk) 20:47, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , sorry, I can see now that my comments were unclear to a fault.. GoldyMcDonald, SalahGood, and Resapp are ✅ to RandomAccount1235423 and should be (re)tagged and moved to the relevant SPI. Younghistorian19 is actually ❌. Gal17928 is ✅ to Gala19000. Apologies again for the confusion!   Maxim (talk)  01:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I blocked Younghistorian19 based on the result of this SPI; I will unblock them now.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:59, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Removed GoldyMcDonald, SalahGood, and Resapp. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * GoldyMcDonald, SalahGood, and Resapp moved to RandomAccount1235423, closing. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Seems same Sockpuppet Master Gala19000 have returned. a)New User Borskindlu is POV pushing the same articles that have been targeted by past Socks of Gala19000. Seems both using the same IP (BTW it was blocked automaticaly by CU since March 2020 by Bbb23 and Zzuuzz)

b) Blocked IP (31.21.68.15) edit Operation Claw-Eagle 2 article and two hours later Borskindlu edit the same article and the same edit summary. Look at IP31.21.68.15Edit.sumary / Borskindlu Edit sumary

c) The same behaviour in all articles regarding Turkish armed forces: Same POV behaviour, source errase and non-constructive edits. POV push on Operation Spring Shield He got reverted once He keep pushing his POV edit Rollback edit made on his edits

d) In Central Libya offensive (2020) article same POV style. Anon IP 31.21.68.15 also watch out the language, the same by New account Borskindlu same edit same edit summary.

e) Both update Turkish national Football team article: - Sockpuppet Gal17 (Gala19000) 1 2 3 - IP 31.21.68.15 1 2 3 4 - New Sock Account Borskindlu 1 2 3

f) More proofs, same behaviour. - IP 31.21.68.15 on Cyprus - Borskindlu on Cyprus

Mr.User200 (talk) 18:55, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but regarding the IPs, specially the first one (31.21.68.15), last time a Cu was carried out 31.21.68.15 was CU Blocked too.Mr.User200 (talk) 19:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The following accounts are ✅ to Gala19000 sock :


 * Both accounts blocked and tagged. .-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:25, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , Just wondering why Borskindlu was tagged as proven insteads of confirmed? -- RoySmith (talk) 23:12, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , Checkusers do not directly link IPs to accounts in SPIs. This would be a violation of our privacy policies. A Clerk or admin will review the evidence regarding the IPs specifically. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The IPs haven't edited since, so closing for now. GABgab 20:27, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Seems same Sockpuppet Master Gala19000 have returned. a) New user Rajvad12 is POV pushing the same article that have been a prefered Socks of Gala19000. Keeps pushing for the same numbers in article Operation Spring Shield https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Operation_Spring_Shield&diff=prev&oldid=1017752323 here

b) Keeps hounding other editors talk pages, accusing other of disruptive editing.Cengo 1992 talk page again.

Mr.User200 (talk) 00:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * .  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   06:50, 21 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Not much to go on here as the accused only has 3 edits. But they're in a different country from the most recent socks, so it's unlikely that they are operated by the same person. Closing. – bradv  🍁  04:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Seems another IP-Sockpuppet of Gala19000 have returned, with the same editing patterns of the last blocked Sockpuppet Borskindlu.

a) New IP user edits the same articles proven Gala19000 sock made in the past.

Borskindlu (Past Sock) - Errase information from Koral Article 2

New IP - First, 2

b) Edit summary - Insist on edit warring everytime: Borskindlu (Past Sock) - Insist to "revert all day" New IP - Insist to "I will keep undo your edit"

c) The same behaviour in all articles regarding Turkish armed forces: Same POV behaviour, source errase and non-constructive edits.

New IP user:

Try to turn talk pages into forums and label other authors by their country of origin here

New IP errases information he dont like here

Try to use WP:TWITTER to back his POV edit and revert a UN Security Panel information because he dont like it. here. Mr.User200 (talk) 22:27, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' The IP users have similair tone, likely each others socks. Shadow4dark (talk) 23:02, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅. Bagging and tagging sock account. . Leaving SPI report open for behavioral investigation on the IP addresses listed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:06, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm confused. I already blocked and tagged the account back in March.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:09, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Ponyo - I noticed that when I was going to block the account... I have no idea why this was listed again...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:21, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The IPs and associated ranges haven't edited in quite some time. Closing. --Blablubbs&#124;talk 19:47, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See below. --Blablubbs&#124;talk 08:38, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This IP came up in the last report, where I declined action because it was inactive by the time I got to it. I was just alerted on my talk page that it became active again. Given the interest in the KORAL Electronic Warfare System and the fact that the IP is continuing to reinstate edits by confirmed socks,, I'm confident that this is the same person. – please block it for two weeks. Thanks. --Blablubbs&#124;talk 08:39, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Blocked as requested. Close. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 21:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets


Another IP of the same range restoring edits made by blocked IP, more likely a block evation by multiple Gala1900 IPs. a) b) Restoring comments made by the previosly blocked SP 94.54.97.15, made yesterday. Is the same POV style and the same article.Mr.User200 (talk) 17:01, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Blocked 94.54.97.15 edit
 * New IP from range 94.54.97.15 edit

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - it's them. Please give two weeks off. The range is virtually empty, so we don't need to worry about collateral. Thanks.  --Blablubbs&#124;talk 17:24, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I have blocked the /21 range for two weeks as requested. The block could easily be made longer, and I perceive that the bad edits started around 4 April. EdJohnston (talk) 22:19, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. No objections to you or anyone else extending the block duration, I just tend to be cautious with recommending long rangeblocks for ISPs I'm unfamiliar with. Closing --Blablubbs&#124;talk 22:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
New IP of Gala19000, restoring the same edits made by previous IPs of Gala19000 on KORAL Electronic Warfare System. Edits made by past Socks: Previous Sock User (User:Borskindlu): 1 Second Sock User (User:TSKEnjoyer12): 2 Previous IP: 3 Edits being made by Current IP (Suspicious Sock): a,b,c Mr.User200 (talk) 00:18, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' See filter log, he tried something interesting []Shadow4dark (talk) 00:55, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Response, Yes also found this.Attempts to change my User page. Conveniently to errase all the list of past Sockpuppets of Gala19000.Mr.User200 (talk) 12:37, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * It's a dynamic IP that hasn't edited in weeks, there's nothing to be done here even if the IP is evading a block. Closing.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC)