Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GameOn/Archive

08 September 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

GameOn is accusing many people for being sockpuppets. I guess it maybe takes one to be one. When it comes to BjörnBergman, GameOn has defended BjörnBergman in a discussion where BjörnBergman clearly just couldn't think straight and GameOn accused the other person for being a sockpuppet without any apparent reason at all. See User talk:83.250.44.41 Mr. Atom Scania (talk) 15:26, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I don't know what CheckUser acctually is, but I want the IP addresses checked. Mr. Atom Scania (talk) 15:53, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  15:40, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note related SPI case.
 * ... and just as it would take more there for a credible suspicion of abuse of multiple accounts, so does it here. And FWIW, coming to this administrative corner here where editors try to prevent disruption by recognizing and blocking sockpuppet accounts and opening a case with "it maybe takes one to be one" is quite inappropriate and only weakens your case. Anyway, GameOn has talked with E.G. (and I assume the IP talk page mentioned above was hist) a number of times before, has reported his socks before here and at svWP. That alone would be plausible reason for him to post on that talk page. No concrete evidence provided, and none obvious after a glance at these quite established accounts, closing this case. Amalthea  11:54, 17 September 2012 (UTC)