Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Garvit34507/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The connection between these two is very ducky.
 * I indeffed Garvit34507 as a temporary measure to get him to talk. He was making boneheaded edits like this where he stuffs 13 names into a film's starring parameter and adding the repetitive "the film stars ___ in lead roles" (vs. "the film stars ___.") This is all duplicated by Arvind here. It also felt to me that Garvit was deliberately doing this to be a pain in the arse.
 * Several articles of intersection as detailed here.

So while it is ducky, I'm requesting a CU to see if there are other accounts related, since we have had problems with people like, who would deliberately insert deliberate MOS violations in their edits amid constructive changes, and they were doing it to be a pain in the arse. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:52, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I can't be of help on this case, sorry. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 18:15, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets


Likely block evasion of Garvit34507
 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * 1) The user is mostly interested in arbitrary cast changes like their master (contribs of Garvit34507 vs Wonderfully4312).
 * 2) All edits are in Mobile Android app.
 * 3) Adds redundancies like starring and lead roles in the same sentence. (Diff:, )
 * 4) They are also keen in stuffing as many cast members as possible in starring parm. of Ala Vaikunthapurramuloo which happens to be Wonderfully4312's first ever edit (Diff:, , and one of the first edits of their previous sock Arvind Khanvillkar, Diff: Ab207 (talk) 15:43, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Everything stated in the report, plus some other technical indicators I've spotted makes this certain enough to call proven on behavior alone. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:24, 4 June 2021 (UTC)