Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Genericname23/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

A new editor, User:SebastianLeño, recently joined the project by creating Renée Cinderhouse with one concise edit. They then went on to improve the article. However, while reviewing the article for WP:AFC I noticed that the draft was shockingly similar to Renée Cinderhouse, which was deleted twice recently. This deleted article was created by User:Genericname23, another relatively new editor who expressed disappointment the AfD (Articles for deletion/Renée Cinderhouse) ended in a delete vote. I suspect this is either a case of sockpuppetry or possibly some off-wiki canvasing/meatpuppetry; I will note that an admin should also look at the deleted article to see if it is comparable to the new draft. SamHolt6 (talk) 00:30, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ❌, closing. Also, comparing the articles, while there is some overlap in prose, there are some variances, and it is my suspicion that these are two different people working for the same client but unrelated to one another. The technical data simply does not bare out them being the same person and while theoretically possible that they are working together, I also find that unlikely. If there's evidence of TOU or COI guideline violations that don't involve outing, take it to COIN.TonyBallioni (talk) 14:54, 17 December 2018 (UTC)