Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/George-Washington-did-9-11/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

George-Washington-did-9-11 is created 18:25, 5 March 2018, first edits at 18:30, 5 March 2018, is blocked by Bishonen at 19:11, 5 March 2018 and last edits (so far) at 19:26, 5 March 2018.

Holly drepord is then created at 21:59, 5 March 2018.

George-Washington-did-9-11's main target for vandalism is Architectural designer An example is here and the article's revision history is here. They also go in for a line of argument about how badly they are being treated, and warning other users - see for example their initial user page.

Holly drepord was created at 21:59, 5 March 2018 Thirteen minutes later at 22:12, 5 March 2018 they are back at Architectural designer with a new joke, which is being a naive new user who thinks it is all a blog. While there they also undo and redo an edit made earlier by George-Washington-did-9-11. It is worth noting that prior to this evening the article had been unedited since 10:50, 18 June 2017 and its pattern seems to have been just a few edits a year. For two new editors to start on it in the same night seems like too much of a coincidence.

Holly drepord also does the same or similar warnings/complaints about how they are treated.

I believe this constitutes behavioural evidence that the blocked user George-Washington-did-9-11 returned almost immediately as Holly drepord. I am requesting CheckUser because I guess that they will be back again if Holly drepord is blocked, or just for fun anyway. My understanding (which is limited) is that with CU evidence it may be possible to limit the creation of accounts from an IP or small range. I apologize if this case is not as well presented as it should be or if I have made errors in my evidence or request. This is my first such report in a very long time here and I will hope to learn from how it progresses, or does not. Thank you. DBaK (talk) 23:11, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Plz block per WP:DUCK. There's way too much of a coincidence to be two brand-new vandals at the same article. If they're not the same person, there would 100% be meat-puppetry going on, which I doubt. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 23:25, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:06, 6 March 2018 (UTC)