Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Georgesleb2/Archive

03 March 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

IP sockpuppet engaging in the same behavior Georgesleb2 was blocked for. Eeekster (talk) 23:18, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - This case is so obvious it does not need a checkuser. Someguy1221 (talk) 00:51, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * IP blocked for 1 week, and master's block extended to 1 week, for evasion. Someguy1221 (talk) 00:51, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

08 March 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All have the same prefix 178.135. lots of the editing done by these IP's are similar to George's edits before the block  Jay  Jay What did I do? 00:23, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Hopping all over the place across (or possibly smaller sub-ranges within that...). Not much chance of a range block. SpitfireTally-ho! 00:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Rangeblocked via Special:Abusefilter/201. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 11:53, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
 * This seems like a reasonable solution, good thinking. Would someone like to up the block on to indef? Or are we going to leave that as temporary? (personally I think indef is called for at this point). Cheers! SpitfireTally-ho! 14:56, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I think indef block would be appropriate.  Jay  Jay What did I do? 22:35, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Extended block to indefinite. Left tag on their userpage NativeForeigner Talk 02:26, 12 March 2013 (UTC)