Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gfdssfdg/Archive

Evidence submitted by JpGrB
The user continues to disrupt and vandalize the same pages much like previously blocked sock puppets of Gfdssfdg.

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
self-endorse for CU attention, looking through the history of various pages it's clear that this user is making use of multiple accounts in excess, I've added some accounts to the suspected sockpuppets section, but I'd like a checkuser to please confirm the link, and to do a search for any sleepers, regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 08:50, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ the following:


 * IP blocked. Swaggaholic94 is . Dominic·t 12:23, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Tagged and bagged but, unless I'm mistaken, safgohdgfn isn't actually a registered account? I presume you meant Dsafgohdgfn instead. ~ Amory ( u  •  t  •  c ) 16:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * IP blocked. Swaggaholic94 is . Dominic·t 12:23, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Tagged and bagged but, unless I'm mistaken, safgohdgfn isn't actually a registered account? I presume you meant Dsafgohdgfn instead. ~ Amory ( u  •  t  •  c ) 16:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * IP blocked. Swaggaholic94 is . Dominic·t 12:23, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Tagged and bagged but, unless I'm mistaken, safgohdgfn isn't actually a registered account? I presume you meant Dsafgohdgfn instead. ~ Amory ( u  •  t  •  c ) 16:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * IP blocked. Swaggaholic94 is . Dominic·t 12:23, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Tagged and bagged but, unless I'm mistaken, safgohdgfn isn't actually a registered account? I presume you meant Dsafgohdgfn instead. ~ Amory ( u  •  t  •  c ) 16:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * IP blocked. Swaggaholic94 is . Dominic·t 12:23, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Tagged and bagged but, unless I'm mistaken, safgohdgfn isn't actually a registered account? I presume you meant Dsafgohdgfn instead. ~ Amory ( u  •  t  •  c ) 16:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Report date March 21 2010, 19:38 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

First edit was to create a fully fleshed-out article about a small-time rap group. Combine that with the username, and this is yet another Pretzky sock. However, I'm requesting a sweep to find more socks, since this user has a history of creating large numbers of socks in a short period of time. Blueboy96 19:38, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Blueboy96


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by Blueboy96 19:38, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

Auntie E. (talk) 19:45, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * While this doesn't appear to be, these accounts are tied to another indefblocked editor - see Sockpuppet investigations/Gfdssfdg. The following are ✅ as being the same editor;


 * ... series of other blocked/checked accounts ...
 * ... series of other blocked/checked accounts ...


 * Also, -  A l is o n  ❤ 20:05, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

case moved from Sockpuppet investigations/Pretzky to Sockpuppet investigations/Gfdssfdg. Tim Song (talk) 20:18, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

Blocked and tagged. Tim Song (talk) 20:18, 21 March 2010 (UTC)