Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gfstudent21/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.


 * Both users have edit List of awards and nominations received by GFriend.
 * Both users keep adding same content (non-notable awards, there is consensus regarding them in Talk:List of awards and nominations received by GFriend and WT:KO) even after me and other editors revert/rollback it. In addition, the content both users added have the same formatting in which one of the row scope (the row with 'Best Of Best' Naver Music Awards) is not formatted correctly and there's also additional cells hence breaking the table.
 * Both users delete content and publish it, before pasting older revision and publish it. This is new revision  with consolidate table format, whereas this is old revision  before everything was consolidated into single table.
 * Both users edit exclusively on mobile web.
 * User (Wicked-pedia Editor has been blocked once for disruptive editing as requested through WP:RPP and WP:AIV), however both exhibited similar suspicious behavior. –  Paper9oll (📣 • 📝)  12:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Pretty clearly tag-teaming to push the same content in, obvious enough that I don't think CU is necessary. Sock, master blocked a month. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:08, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Comments: There may be additional account created as user is very evasive. I initially only added Sock1 and Sock2. And also Sock3 which is already blocked.
 * Sock1 (Inception-ggf) and 2 (Mint-Chocopiedt) both have similar edit summary "Music program, variety show awards, non-notable award (inclusive of category) shouldn't be included inside this article". However, this is my edit summary which I inputted in when reverting Sock1 edit. However at that time, Sock2 wasn't created yet hence it's very suspicious that Sock2 1st edit have the same summary as Sock1.
 * Sock1 also keep pushing content which coincidentally is similar to what blocked user Wicked-pedia Editor and Gfstudent21 pushed into List of awards and nominations received by GFriend before.
 * Sock1 also exhibited similar behavior by continously being disruptive despite after getting warned by me and other editors.
 * Sock1, 3 and 4 have similar edit summary after Sock1 was blocked for edit warring.
 * All accounts edit exclusively only mobile. –  Paper9oll (📣 • 📝)  16:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅. Bagging and tagging all accounts. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same as evidence presented in January 6, 2021. User created another account evading block. Sock6 is the newest known account. The diff evidence can be compared against Point 2 in January 6, 2021 investigation report section, they are 100% the same. –  Paper9oll (📣 • 📝)  06:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All accounts already blocked. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 19:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC)