Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ghafarado/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User:Ghafarado created Omar Al Mohammed first on March 18, it was deleted under G11 by Jimfbleak. Draft:Omar Al Mohammed was then created a couple of times and deleted. Today, the account User:Bahrainbest was created, and they started a draft in their sandbox (now at Draft:Omar Al Mohammed), that User:Ghafarado also has edited. Sam Sailor 08:39, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:43, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Account created today and has only edited and submitted Draft:Omar Al Mohammed for review. Sam Sailor 14:34, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Very. . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

has revamped Omar Al Mohammed and moved it unreviewed from draft space into main space. (An AFD discussion has been opened at Articles for deletion/Omar Al Mohammed.) Fijigirl333 openly declares on their user page that hey have been paid to do so.I notice that this account was created back in February, but laid dormant until 5 May. I wonder if technical evidence suggests that there is connection to other paid editors that is not revealed by behavioral evidence. Sam Sailor 09:57, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Happy for any technical check to happen. There is no connection between the previous editors and me. I was hired by an individual which I have duly disclosed. I have been paid to create this article which I disclosed even before I made any edit to the draft.

If there was a previous editor who disclosed or didnt disclose their affiliation but is not connected to me, how have I violated any policy? Fijigirl333 (talk) 14:32, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
❌. Based on CU logs and behavioral evidence, Fijigirl333 is. Block and tagged accordingly. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:45, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

recreating Draft:Omar Al Mohammed + username similarity, see Praxidicae (talk) 15:32, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked, tagged, G5, salted. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)