Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ginyattri/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
The alleged master is the older by a month. A few edits in 2019, then slept and awoke after Karmja created Draft:Jitendra Sharma, a draft where they have a COI.

Karmja appears to work at the organisation with Jitendra Sharma and states that their CPI is out of admiration. They have been warned by in their unblock message that they must declare their COI. They have not done so. This is redolent of UPE.

YasaswaniSai is very recent, first edits today, and appears to have been created as reputation washing for Karmja

Quacking is present with these three, but the behaviour of sleeping for a period prior to awakening for a (potential) UPE article suggests other sleepers, hence CU for a sleeper check, please 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:48, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

User:Karmja's original account name was User:Amtzwiki, and changed it after a warning about promotional usernames. Wikishovel (talk) 14:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments



 * I'll tag and block this spam farm. --Yamla (talk) 13:05, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Their sandbox is a ChatGPT recreation of Draft:Jitendra Sharma. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:42, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * to ❌. As always, CU data cannot rule out WP:MEAT. --Yamla (talk) 12:51, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * - UtherSRG (talk) 14:38, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Recreating the same Draft:Jitendra Sharma spam as previous socks. Note this is an older account, albeit one with a high proportion of content deleted as inappropriate. Yamla (talk) 12:21, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Again, to ❌. They are operating on the same IP address range as other blocked spammers, but there's no conclusive link between these accounts. Closing with no action, though this does not prohibit an admin subsequently deciding to block for e.g. advertising-only. --Yamla (talk) 12:27, 8 January 2024 (UTC)