Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GiorgosY/Archive

07 April 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Soon after gets indeffed this new sock picks up the very edit-warring that GiorgosY left behind. Please see history of. Also started arguing with the same user GiorgosY had clashed with in the past. . Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 18:24, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi Bishonen. I agree that CU is a great idea. Thank you very much for blocking the sock in the interim. As far as personal attacks just look at this torrent. Take care. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 23:50, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I know Giorgos by the way, and we are working together. He is the one that told me of what is going on here. You can make as much investigations as you like. Don't forget to investigate some more, when I bring a few or more, friends on board.Pampos40 (talk) 19:04, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * You mean you are going to create more sockpuppets? Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 19:28, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I believe there has to be a discussion here, and that his objections should be taken seriously. But in the meantime, let's leave the articles in an acceptable shape. --Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 19:38, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * This page is for discussing GiorgosY's socking, not the articles he is edit-warring on. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 19:52, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

This page has being made as part of the personal attacks that Dr.K thinks that he is achieving, along with deleting my edits and adding stop signs in my user page for war editing, while he is the one that he is deleting my additions, with no excuse or reason on what so ever, in order for me to react and accuse me for war edit, calling me sock puppet also with no prove on what so ever as well, and the rest of his offensive wording is just part of it. Anyone can check this.

Now if Dr.K thinks that if I wanted to create accounts I would come with one from a place that Giorgos works and not with 100's of Ip's from all over the place, then Dr K, is highly mistaken. Not very difficult to do so, isn't it, but do I really need to do so.? Hm I don't think so...

Dr. K, you and the rest of your team, can continue your job of trying fanatically to enforce people on what to add and edit, even about their own country, in order to serve your own agenda and only, ignoring and enforcing the ignoring of all the evidence, (propaganda tactics) while removing all users and additions that are not part of this agenda, along with your tactics of achieving that, and I will come with an appropriate team and tactics to counter it. You can also go and report me to all the admins here, even to yourself, if this makes you happy. Pampos40 (talk) 20:46, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm tempted to indef per WP:DUCK, but I guess a CheckUser wouldn't hurt. To be going on with, I'm blocking Pampos40 for a week for persistent personal attacks and assumptions of bad faith, as well as the threats above to bring in "friends" and a "team". Bishonen &#124; talk 23:03, 7 April 2015 (UTC).
 * ✅ Mike V • Talk 23:57, 7 April 2015 (UTC)