Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Girish.unnithan/Archive

02 July 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Deepakhmwiki requested unblock at UTRS #8099. I can't tell whether the behavioral evidence is enough, which is why I am bringing it here. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:16, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
CU results are by Ponyo. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:16, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
 * In that case, User:Toddst1 should be pinged to review. Dennis Brown &#124; 2¢ &#124;  WER  00:32, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
 * This looks quite a bit more like editors with a large conflict of interest (Deepak even admits it), than sockpuppets. I don't think blocking is the right call.... Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:05, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
 * As the blocking admin, I've unblocked since s/he appears to have addressed the issues. Toddst1 (talk) 14:37, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Deferring to the blocking admin and closing. Dennis Brown &#124; 2¢ &#124;  WER  14:39, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Unclosed. Toddst1 says he's unblocked, but Deepak is still blocked. I still do not think that Deepak is a sockpuppet. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:03, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm still not quite sure, but unblocking may be a good idea here on the principle of innocent until proven guilty. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:04, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Given no reply in several days, I assume Toddst1 would not object to unblocking the accused sock as well and have thus unblocked. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:42, 7 July 2013 (UTC)