Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Glaurie/Archive

09 March 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Three brand new accounst working on a brand new article which started very promotional Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 19:34, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Below is the evidence submitted at Sockpuppet investigations/Ekkuto by Joseph2302 which I have merged here: SmartSE (talk) 20:44, 9 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Both SPAs on TearSolutions, and both of them only have edits to TearSolutions and Articles for deletion/TearSolutions.


 * Comparing &  with  &  make it seems like a WP:DUCK- they both vote "maintain" rather than "keep" (which is the term usually used), and both forget to sign and then sign in a second post. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:03, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I'd already started an SPI at Sockpuppet investigations/Ekkuto, guessing this one should just redirect/merge there. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:45, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Apologies missed that one. Yes let's merge. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 19:47, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm merging that to here since Glaurie is an older account. SmartSE (talk) 20:40, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please, compare those accounts.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  20:58, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * and are  related to each other.  is  based solely on the technical info available. This may very well be a canvass/WP:MEAT situation as opposed to basic socking.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  21:25, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I left them warnings against meatpuppetry. Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  12:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)