Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Glenjenvey/Archive

Report date February 8 2009, 22:39 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

This username has not been in use since April 2007.
 * Evidence submitted by D-Notice (talk)

However, in January 2009 Mr Jenvey was reported to the UK's Press Complaints Commission for an article in the Sun newspaper (now removed from the Sun's website) regarding alleged terrorist plots against British Jews on a website called Ummah.com. The only edits that user PCCLIES has made have been to support Mr Jenvey's position.

I'm also suspicious about the fact that the new user has the name "PCCLIES" which IMHO suggests that this new user has an agenda. D-Notice (talk) 22:39, 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I've added Toryblue, who spammed Jenvey's youtube page:
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abu_Izzadeen&diff=prev&oldid=127981810 added Jenvey's name in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ahlus_Sunnah_wal_Jamaah&diff=prev&oldid=132456113 and generally seems 100% to be the same user.
 * User:Ali masharli is also 100% definitely Jenvey. Note that Ali marshali CREATED the Glen Jenvey page and the username is the same as Jenvey's youtube userid: http://www.globalpolitician.com/22531-terror (also the link added by toryblue). If you look at the edits they are adding links to Jenvey site, and also display similar bad grammar and spelling: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Al-Qaeda&diff=prev&oldid=77514879
 * I've also added Mister Blue Shoe as it is a single purpose account created for the express purpose of removing material from Jenvey's page. Probably not Jenvey (seems to be able to spell), but should be checked out given the sockpuppet pattern of this user Sumbuddi (talk) 18:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Jenvey continues to disruptively edit his entry at Glen Jenvey using his PCCLIES sockpuppet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.31.165.80 (talk) 12:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

Actually code letter E applies, as glenjenvey is a banned user. See also for evidence that glenjenvey is pcclies. 82.31.165.80 (talk) 16:01, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments by other users

Requested by D-Notice (talk) 22:39, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * Please provide a code letter. Tiptoety  talk 05:45, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * There would seem to be sufficient confusion here that only a CU will make things clear. Mayalld (talk) 15:28, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * endorsed for a further check - there are now two of the socks which shouldn't be stale. Mayalld (talk) 15:12, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * seems to have dropped off Mayalld (talk) 13:15, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * There's two socks that aren't stale? I only see one – . Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 18:36, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, my bad. Forgot what year it is! Mayalld (talk) 14:43, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions
 * All but one account is . Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 19:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

PCCLIES can be best dealt with for disruption if required. Mayalld (talk) 14:43, 19 February 2009 (UTC) Mayalld (talk) 14:43, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Report date March 16 2009, 00:45 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Please see the first case, closed because there was only 1 active sockpuppet. Now both of the sockpuppets above are active. Both appear to be socks of banned user Glenjenvey. See first case for more information.
 * Evidence submitted by Sumbuddi (talk)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by Sumbuddi (talk) 00:45, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

based on a combination of technical evidence & edits that PCCLIES = ToryBlue. Glenjenvey is stale, so I can't say for sure if they are his socks. -- Versa geek  06:41, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

- blocked the two accounts (please tag/archive), To me knowing that the PCCLIES = ToryBlue makes it fairly likely that they are Glenjenvey's socks based on behavior evidence. Regardless it really does not matter that much :). ——  nix eagle email me 18:25, 16 March 2009 (UTC)