Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gmalc90/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
were created within one minute of each other and thus far have made only unconstructive edits. For "90" see diff1 and for "9090" see diff2. Blue Riband► 11:58, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Yes, this is the second time I've malformed the SPI report. It seems then when I pull down the "warn" menu in Twinkle to leave a suspected sockpupped warning on the editor's talk page it generates the form to file the actual report.  Maybe I've been doing it backwards.  I'll check the procedure before making another report. Blue Riband► 12:25, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * , warnings are often counterproductive in sockpuppetry cases; they're one of the few times you're better making a report without warning the accounts. In terms of how to do that with Twinkle: From the Twinkle dropdown go to the ARV menu, change the report type to "Sockpuppet" or "Sockpuppeteer" (depending on which one the account is), fill out the relevant boxes with the details of the other accounts and your evidence, then submit. Thanks, --Jack Frost (talk) 12:32, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Moved to correct account name and report formatted., if you're filing SPI reports, might I suggest using Twinkle; it makes it much easier! . --Jack Frost (talk) 12:18, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Noting that was created by  prior to that account's first edit and both accounts' 3 cumulative edits have been entirely unconstructive thus far.  - Please block  indefinitely, with a final warning for  regarding sockpuppetry & vandalism (I can do the warning if preferred). --Jack Frost (talk) 12:25, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Blocked and warned.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 14:28, 4 August 2022 (UTC)