Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GoaInsomnia/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Please check GoaInsomnia against Ancistrus80. The IP I think there's sufficient behavioural evidence. All SPA accounts relating to the article Stefan Certic; all have made few or no other edits other than to Articles for deletion/Stefan Certic or the article.

Could be WP:MEAT but I doubt it. Mkdw  talk 00:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked and tagged.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:50, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I forgot. is also ✅, blocked, and tagged. Normally, I wouldn't block a zero-edit account that was created that long ago, but given the master's behavior ... --Bbb23 (talk) 00:54, 9 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Closing. GABgab 00:53, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Recreated a nearly word for word version of the article Stefan Certic that was subject to deletion following an AFD. Please compare against ; I'm declining to run the check myself as I filed the original AFD. ran the last check. Mkdw  talk 19:15, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
A CU isn't needed. Blocked and tagged based on behavior.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:39, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I asked for the CU because there was more than one individual involved in this situation which I forgot to mention in the SPI. who was more forthcoming about their involvement and I don't suspect this new SPA is them as you're right the behavioural evidence is very strong that it is GoaInsomnia. Case can be archived. Mkdw  talk  21:06, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Another SPA. See and. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 19:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Also, . —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 15:27, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

This claim is false, and as such it needs to be checked. I will be waiting for administrator confirmation prior to any statement.--Edwmgs (talk) 19:00, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

An article in question has been created using translation of same article from Russian and Serbian + personal research committed to improve quality. By checking the differences that's more then clear. Anyhow, thanks for the nice welcome. From defending an article, to defending my account. what's next. Security Clearance. --Edwmgs (talk) 23:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Requesting SPI to clear the incorrect claim. --Edwmgs (talk) 23:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please, compare to the master and previous socks.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  09:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * is technically ❌ to this sockmaster and previous socks. Yunshui 雲 水 13:47, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  10:35, 19 March 2017 (UTC)