Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Grandmangojoy/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

Same kind of disruptive and poorly sourced editing in the same articles. Xexerss (talk) 15:29, 22 April 2023 (UTC) Xexerss (talk) 15:29, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - . MarioGom (talk) 15:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 15:54, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * @RoySmith gah, sorry Roy, I forgot to mark it as in progress. My findings are: "accounts ✅, no comment on IPs. Accounts blocked (if unblocked) and tagged. I didn't do a deep dive for sleepers as I have to run, so if someone else wants to dig deeper feel free!" So perhaps good that you're taking a look too! firefly  ( t · c ) 15:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * No problem, but I believe it's spelled gagh. Other than that, I agree with everything. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:59, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Same edits in the same article. Xexerss (talk) 19:24, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * , see Bu of Gojoseon history. MarioGom (talk) 22:44, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * is very very, is possilikely. They're both already blocked, so I'll go with proven and suspected tags on them.  is ✅ (also blocked already). Don't see any more at present.  Girth Summit  (blether)  16:47, 25 April 2023 (UTC)